Appearance versus reality has been an ongoing philosophical issue within the Western Classical Tradition for centuries; it involves the very essence of the culture and heritage of the West, beginning with the Pre-Socratics (e.g., Parmenides), and continuing with Plato, Aristotle…to Heidegger; and until the dawn of modern Philosophy, where linguistic hermeneutics began to prevail, constituted the dominant foundation of philosophical inquiry. How a thing is presented, or “looks”, as opposed to what a thing “really is”, or the “essence” of being, forms the fundamental philosophical inquiry.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often the case that the Federal or Postal employee is involved in some collateral lawsuit or adversarial process — often directly with the agency itself, in an EEO forum, MSPB or U.S. District Court.
Inevitably, settlement negotiations will often occur, and the issue of whether a Federal or Postal employee can be retroactively “separated” for his or her medical inability to perform one’s job may be offered. How the settlement is formulated; what is stated in the settlement agreement; what promises are made, etc., are all important in order for such agreements to effectively assist in the Federal or Postal employee being able to obtain a Federal Disability Retirement annuity. OPM objects to the Federal Retirement fund being used as a tool for settlement of collateral lawsuits.
Any settlement agreement must not “look” like it is merely a carrot for enticement to medically retire. The reality of the situation is important. As always, we go back to our Western roots — appearance versus reality.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: appearance versus reality in federal disability retirement, beware of settlement agreement provisions disability federal workers, civil service disability, connection between federal disability and other lawsuits, coordinating collateral issues with the advice of a federal disability retirement attorney, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with collateral issues before submitting the federal disability retirement application to the opm, disability settlement provisions and fers medical retirement, disabled federal employees and collateral legal determinations, federal disability lawyer, federal workers compensation disability retirement, fers disability and other legal lawsuits or complaints, filing and pursuing a disability retirement application, filing for OPM disability retirement, how the language of a federal employment settlement can affect federal disability eligibility, interpreting the terms of any settlement with your former federal employer, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawsuits against federal government for accommodation issues and opm disability, nationwide representation of federal employees, no lawsuit is necessary to get federal employee disability, owcp disability retirement, preventive actions in the federal disability retirement application to make sure collateral issues won't be a problem in the future, pursuing a civil lawsuit during the fers disability retirement process, revising the value of a settlement with the federal agency, settlement agreement language on fers disability retirement, the terms and language of a government employment settlement can hurt your chances of getting opm disability retirement, unintended consequences of legal lawsuits in your opm disability claim, usps lawsuits for disability | Leave a comment »