In a Worker’s Comp (DOL/OWCP/FECA) case, causation and causality often loom as significant issues, and doctors often have to walk a difficult line in making unequivocal statements, or somewhat equivocating statements, as to the “cause” of a medical condition or injury. Such statements can sometimes be the singular focus as to the success or failure of an OWCP case. Why? Because OWCP compensable injuries and medical conditions must be related to the job — either as something caused by an accident while on the job, or in some way occupationally related.
In Federal Disability Retirement cases under FERS or CSRS, one can be on a skiing vacation and incur a medical condition or disability, and so long as that person is unable to, because of the medical condition, perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, one is thereby eligible for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS & CSRS.
Sometimes, however, the issue of causation comes into the picture, but can work in a detrimental way, but need not. Let me clarify: In a chemical sensitivity case, or a psychiatric condition which finds its originating “causation” from the workplace, the doctor may want to relate the “cause” of the medical condition directly to the workplace. This is fine, so far as it goes — and, ironically, most doctors (because they have no idea about FERS or CSRS disability retirement) think they are doing their patients a favor by relating it as “causally related” to the workplace. More often than not, however, it can open up a “can of worms” — of being characterized by the Office of Personnel Management as a “situational disability”, which must be avoided like the plague.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Advantages of Federal Disability Retirement | Tagged: a word of warning to federal workers with workers comp and disability issues, always an early buyout for disabled postal workers, casualty disability retirement and situational disability concepts, chemical, chemical sensitivity mcs on federal employees, difficulty in getting feca owcp versus opm disability, early retirement for medical issues available for federal employees, eligibility advantage of opm disability versus dol workers comp, emergency retirement for health related problems federal workers, enhanced retirement benefits for federal workers under workers comp, federal disability for postmasters, federal disability retirement and the "pre-existing" condition, federal employee medical retirement, federal employee's injury aggravated by an underlying pre-existing condition, federal employees who don't sustain job-related injuries or illnesses, fers disability and the issue of where the injury originated, injury on the job concept: situational disability for postal and fed workers, it's situational, law firm for federal disability retirement, medical condition not caused but aggravated by federal employment, medical condition origin not relevant when filing for fers disability, medical retirement from federal employment, MSPB Disability Retirement, notes on illness causation and situation disability for federal employees, OPM disability doesn’t have to be job-related, opm disability law firm, opm disability retirement blog, opm law firm clients, opm medical disability, OPM medical retirement, opm situational disability as a landmine difficult to overcome, owcp dol, OWCP has to be job-related, place of injury and workers comp notes, qualifications differences between owcp and opm disability, resources for ill or injured federal workers with no job-related conditions, Situational Disability and the Federal Worker, situational disability as a possible issue for chemical sensitivity, situational federal disability, the dangers of getting your opm claim situational, the workplace and medical condition connection, understanding differences between workers comp and opm disability, warning to federal employees about situational disability, what caused a medical condition not important in opm disability retirement, why causation in not usually an issue in opm disability retirement, workplace injuries and fers disability "situational" disability | 1 Comment »
