Whether fair or not; whether consistent or a lack thereof; the one who holds the power of determination ultimately has the authority of interpretation — until and unless a higher authority supersedes such power.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the Federal or Postal employee can seemingly comply with all of the requirements of the laws and case-laws governing Federal Disability Retirement eligibility and entitlement, and still be denied.
The standard response on the telephone is often, “I thought I had a slam-dunk case…” But the problem with approaching a governmental bureaucracy is that one assumes (wrongly) that application of the law will be implemented in an interpretively consistent manner. But where individuals are involved, a multiplicity of interpretive approaches will surface.
Some OPM personnel will focus upon certain legal aspects over others; others will apply a “higher” bar of passage as to what meets the “preponderance of the evidence” test; and still others will be so obtuse as to refuse, or merely fail to, accept that when a doctor (for example) states that a condition is “permanent”, that such a statement logically entails and encapsulates the satisfaction of the requirement that a medical condition will last a “minimum of 12 months“.
How to respond to such inconsistencies? By reasserting the law; citing applicable case-law; by preemptively guiding OPM into approving one’s Federal Disability Retirement case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, authority to interpret the law under fers or csrs disability retirement, believing on opm's excuses to deny your federal disability benefits, calculating your response to a fers disability denial of benefits, common excuses the opm uses to deny disability benefits, Common OPM Excuses for Federal Disability Denials, denial of fers disability benefits and the proper response, don't believe the excuses opm uses to deny your federal disability claim, excuses the opm disability specialist uses to deny disability benefits, federal disability law blog, filing an opm disability denial response with a postal attorney, law interpretation in cases where federal employees need to get disability retirement, legal authority on opm disability retirement law, looking for excuses in the opm disability retirement packet to deny an application, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement, opm's statutory authority over federal disability claims, owcp disability retirement, quoting common excuses the opm uses to justify denial of disability benefits, reasons and excuses the opm uses to deny fers disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, response to denial of opm disability retirement benefits, the authority to interpret and administer opm disability law, the chain of authority to decide the fate of the federal disability retirement application, USPS disability retirement benefits, what excuses the office of personnel management uses to deny disability, when the opm tries to find excuses to deny a fers disability retirement application, who has the authority to approve disability retirement for us government employees? | Leave a comment »