What is wrong with going to the essence of the matter, skipping the process, and reducing everything to its lowest common denominator? Doesn’t efficiency demand such an approach? Isn’t the most effective method of attaining an end, to identify the units of measurement which determine the outcome of a potential formula, then to focus upon developing such units and discarding the ancillary components?
The problem with such an approach, of course, should be self-evident: it ignores the meticulous procedural steps which comprise the importance of process. “Process” is often ignored by the second and subsequent generational leaders. It is likened to doing away with the social courtesies and rituals surrounding an activity.
In religious contexts, it represents the sacred steps which one must embrace in order to complete the ritual itself; and, in some societies, the process itself is of greater importance than the completion and attainment of the objective for which it is engaged. To ignore the process and merely piece together the lowest common denominators, is to undermine the relevance of the activity itself. Sequence of ritualistic application is important; how one does it, is often of greater relevance than what one does.
For Federal and Postal employees who suffer from a medical condition, such that the medical condition prevents one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, the time for consideration in filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, has come to a critical point of fruition. But filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is not merely a matter of filling out forms (SF 3107 series for FERS, along with SF 3112 series; SF 2801 series for CSRS, along with SF 3112); for, if that were the case, one should simply do so post-haste.
But that would be a self-defeating proposition; and once the U.S. Office of Personnel Management receives that Federal Disability Retirement application based upon the approach of the lowest common denominator, they may well respond with a similar unit of division: one which takes into account merely the numerical efficiency of a denial, and not the human reality of one’s medical condition.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: after much time and reflection the time for disability retirement filing is now, allowing a very small time for reflection among the primary themes of the federal disability retirement application, applying for disability in the postal service, applying for federal disability retirement is not about merely filing out a bunch of standard forms, attorney for civil service disability claims, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, csrs disability retirement guidance, denying fers disability applications for the sake of simplicity?, disability retirement and reasonable accommodation or reassignment, disability retirement application, disability retirement application federal employees, federal disability blog, federal disability retirement in any state of territory of the United States, federal disability retirement lawyer with many years of experience, federal disability retirement legal assistance, federal disability retirement rules, federal employee disability under fers, fehb benefits on disability retirement federal and postal employees, fers disability and other options, fers federal disability retirement application, filing and pursuing a disability retirement application, filing medical retirement forms in a logical sequence, following numerical efficiency denials after receiving many federal disability retirement applications, I need help with owcp or disability retirement, just denied for fers disability retirement, law firm opm disability, law firm serving disabled federal workers all across america, lawyer representing federal employees for disability retirement throughout the united states, long term federal disability retirement, nationwide federal disability law firm, owcp and disability retirement, owcp and opm federal government, owcp disability and fers retirement, partial owcp disability, post office owcp disability, postal disability retirement blog, questions & answers about fers federal disability retirement, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the imperfect sequence of filing and urgent federal disability retirement claim, the lowest common denominator concept in federal disability retirement theory, the numerical efficiency of a fers disability retirement denial, the sequence of decisions made by the opm, usps disability retirement health benefits | Leave a comment »