Carefully. With discretion. With an intelligent approach. Not indiscriminately (a double-negative which, in common parlance, means “discriminately”). Quantification of pain, of a medical condition, of a loss of use of one’s body functions, ability to have the manual dexterity of the use of one’s fingers, hands, arms; of the flexion and range of motion of shoulders, etc., includes a level of subjectivity at best, and at worst, possibly misrepresents the extent and severity of a disability.
Further, when quantification of the disability of a particular body part is further interpreted to represent a part of a greater whole — as in OWCP/FECA’s attempt to assign a percentage disability of the “whole person”, or when the Department of Veteran’s Affairs calculates a combined percentage rating which is not merely the addition of all lesser individual ratings — it needs some explaining.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, one should obviously utilize all of the available tools, evidence, compilation of documentary evidence, etc., all of which, in their combined entirety, could help to provide persuasive evidence in obtaining an approval from OPM in a Federal Disability Retirement application. But use of those tools, how it is used, what is used, how it is explained, and whether the explanation is adequate, are all important keys to keep in mind.
OPM is an independent agency. When you attempt to dictate an outcome based upon a decision of another agency, such an attempt will often appear to be a threat to the very independence of an agency; something which needs to be kept in mind. What should be submitted is rarely an issue; how it is stated is always a concern.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: additional documents a federal disability applicant may use as part of evidence in a federal disability retirement claim, additional evidence to sustain your fers disability claim, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, blogs for disabled postal or federal employees, compiling additional supporting documentation, disability quantification and ratings from other federal agencies, Federal Disability, federal disability attorney's advice, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, gathering medical documentation for an incapacitated federal employee, how to help to build a strong case in federal disability retirement, how to prove disability in fers?, how to use percentage designations in fers disability retirement, interpreting percentage designations so you can use them in your federal disability retirement claim, lawyer representing postal workers, making the best of a long situation: filing additional evidence, medical quantitative ratings of importance for the american postal worker, not such a thing as an opm disability "ratings", OPM disability retirement, opm medical documents, Postal disability, relevant criteria to choose the right medical documentation fers disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, stating versus explaining disability ratings in your fers/csrs disability retirement application, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the use disability ratings under fers/csrs, using percentage designations in opm disability retirement calculation, USPS disability retirement, what medical documents to use in an opm disability application, when to use va disability ratings in your opm disability claim | Leave a comment »
