The problem with being responsible for something, is that the moment there are any consequences which result from the assertion of it, everyone lifts their finger and points it in another direction.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence, that he or she is eligible and entitled to Federal Disability Retirement benefits. Yet, those who simply go through either the local or district Human Resources (sometimes euphemistically referred to as the “Human Capital” or appended with a conceptually interesting term, “Services”) Office, will be requested to sign SF 3112C, the “Physician’s Statement“, where, at the top of the form, a box for a return address exists. The address to which the physician’s statement and medical records are sent, is often filled in as the Agency’s H.R. Office.
Thus, the consequence of such a chain of events will often be: the individual Federal or Postal employee, who has the responsibility to prove by a preponderance of the evidence one’s Federal Disability Retirement application from OPM, will have a doctor, medical facility, psychiatrist, therapist, and any number of medical providers, directed to forward sensitive medical documentation directly to an agency’s Human Resources Office, prior to reviewing such documents for accuracy, effectiveness or requested formulation. And if the Federal Disability Retirement packet is sent over to OPM, and is then denied based upon information which is either inaccurate or incomplete, to whom will the finger be pointed at?
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof | Tagged: applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, does the opm have access to all your medical records?, federal disability law blog, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and the burden of proof concept, fers disability retirement and the responsibility of the applicant, fers medical retirement lawyer, finger pointing when that fers disability application is denied, lawyer federal retirement disability, lawyer representing postal workers, maintaining medical records while on federal employment, medical records in opm disability application, meeting the burden of eligibility requirements for medical retirement under fers, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability law and the preponderance of evidence concept, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement blog, preponderance of evidence concept in opm disability law, preponderance of the evidence documents, representing federal employees from any us government agency, reviewing your medical information before submitting it to the office of personnel management, SF 3112C Physician's Statement, the importance of medical records in opm disability law, the responsibility of proving your fers disability claim, the unintended consequences of using a sf 3112c during your federal disability retirement processing, using a medical narrative in lieu of sf 3112c, USPS disability retirement, when the applicant does not have any control about what medical documentation goes to the opm, Why not to submit an SF 3112C | Leave a comment »