Once the acceptance of dissociative dichotomy between language and the objective world became entrenched, the path of ease with which to tinker with language in order to adeptly fit language to reality (i.e., redefine words, concepts and meanings) became a simple next step in the process.
There are, of course, limitations. A rock thrown and shattering a bottle is difficult to avoid, no matter how much linguistic gymnastics may be engaged. For reality-based situations which must encounter the language game, one cannot come closer to the correspondence necessary than when one encounters a medical condition.
For the Federal and Postal Worker who must confront the reality of a medical condition, such that the medical condition impacts one’s life, livelihood and future financial security, the reality of the importance of “getting it right” is never more certain.
Often, the question is asked on a purely linguistic level: Will medical condition-X qualify me? That is the wrong question.
For, Federal Disability Retirement, whether under FERS or CSRS, filed through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the question must be asked in an alternative manner, because the entire process of proving one’s case is unlike Social Security Disability and other forums.
In those “other” criteria, the identification of the medical condition itself — i.e., the linguistic identification of the issue — will often be enough to determine qualification criteria. But for Federal Disability Retirement purposes, it is the direct encounter and confrontation between language and reality which must be faced and embraced: Not “what” identified medical condition, but rather, “how” the medical condition impacts, in the real world, the essential elements of one’s job and how one can adequately perform them.
Thus, Federal Disability Retirement cannot avoid the correspondence between language and reality; it is that very question touching upon the nexus between language (the identified medical condition) and reality (how that medical condition impacts the physical or cognitive ability of the worker to engage in the world) which must be answered. Thus, no matter what linguistic deconstructionists declare: language does require a correspondence with reality, and truth does still matter despite the hard-fought and persistent attempts to otherwise make irrelevant that which we all accept in the everyday world.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a personal narrative of how your medical condition affects your work, an accurate description of how your work at the federal agency is limited by your disability, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, civil service disability retirement, communication as a key component to the success of your opm disability claim, describing how your medical condition have an effect on the way you work, describing your disability argument in plain english, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, encouraging your doctor to write a narrative report with integrity, essential elements of a good medical narrative report, explaining clearly in the standard forms the reality of the medical condition and how it affects job performance, explaining how your condition affects your work in the federal workplace, explaining the severity of your medical conditions is not enough in federal disability retirement, FERS Disability, fers disability and considering the impact of several medical conditions, FERS disability retirement, focusing on the narrative of the opm disability applicant, gap between the language and reality need to be small, health conditions that impact job performance in the federal agency, how to explain your medical condition in your postal disability application, legal representation for injured federal workers, maintaining integrity in the opm medical narrative, making sure you explain what tasks of your job you can't do due to your disability, Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements, not what medical conditions but explaining how it affects your federal job, one bridge that is necessary to explain: medical conditions and essential elements, one of the most important explanation you must add in the application is the connection between your disability and how it affects the quality of your work, owcp disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, Post Office disability, repeating the same mantra: the focus is on the nexus, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the connection between language and reality in federal disability retirement claims: a clear explanation of how medical conditions affect specific duties in the workplace, the gap between the medical condition and how it limits the quality of your work, the impact of a medical condition in a federal employee, the impact of an illness in the federal employee, the nexus between the reality of your illness and job performance must be explained in clear English, using creative writing to explain how your medical condition affects work with the agency, USPS Disability, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability, writing not so much about the severity of your medical condition but rather how this condition affects your work as a federal employee | Leave a comment »