• Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Credentials

OPM Disability Retirement

Entries RSS | Comments RSS
  • Pages

    • About Me
    • Contact Us
    • Copyright
    • Credentials
  • Categories

    • Accommodation and Light Duty (40)
    • Advantages of Federal Disability Retirement (27)
    • Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions (44)
    • Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM (43)
    • Burden of Proof (30)
    • Clarifications of Laws or Rules (160)
    • CSRS Disability (1)
    • Eligibility Criteria (18)
    • Evaluation Of Your OPM Disability Claim – How Do I Know If I Have A Strong Case? (17)
    • Fables, Stories and Analogies about CSRS and FERS Medical Retirement Benefits (64)
    • Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted (35)
    • FERS Disability (10)
    • Important Cases, Legal Updates and/or the Current Process Waiting Time (49)
    • Life after Federal Disability Retirement (21)
    • LWOP and Sick Leave in OPM Disability (12)
    • Mental/Nervous Condition (49)
    • Miscellaneous (178)
    • OPM Disability & OWCP Workers Comp Filings (44)
    • OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits (39)
    • OPM Disability & VA Benefits (4)
    • OPM Disability Actors (286)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Agency (54)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Applicant (77)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Attorney (55)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Doctor (53)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Human Resources Office (17)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The MSPB Administrative Judge (6)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The OPM Representatives (31)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Others (9)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Supervisor (13)
    • OPM Disability Administrative Law (Statutory and Non-Statutory Law) (13)
    • OPM Disability and a Hostile Working Environment (11)
    • OPM Disability Application (185)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package (28)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS (62)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS (9)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112C Physician's Statement for CSRS and FERS (15)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112D Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for CSRS and FERS (7)
    • OPM Disability Process (158)
      • OPM Disability Process – 1st Stage: OPM Disability Application (35)
      • OPM Disability Process – 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage (28)
      • OPM Disability Process – 3rd Stage: MSPB Stage (17)
      • OPM Disability Process – 4th Stage: Petition for Full Review at the MSPB (4)
      • OPM Disability Process – 5th Stage: Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (2)
    • OPM Disability Retirement & EEOC Complaints (4)
    • OPM Medical Questionnaire (8)
    • Post-Application Issues (19)
    • Pre-Application Considerations (428)
    • Professional & Expert Witnesses (5)
    • Reasonable Medical Treatment and Compliance Issues (6)
    • Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer (1,735)
    • Resigning or Being Separated From a Federal Agency for Medical Problems or Other Reasons (34)
    • SF 3112 Forms (10)
    • Specific Medical Conditions (28)
    • The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney (79)
    • Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application (202)
    • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) (21)
    • U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (77)
    • U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Disability Retirement (36)
    • Uncategorized (377)
    • When the OPM Application Is Approved (14)
    • When the OPM Application Is Denied (88)
  • Past Blogs

  • Top Posts

    • OPM Disability Retirement Benefits for Federal Employees: Building
    • Contact Us
    • Postal & Federal Medical Retirement: The Commodity of More
    • Long Term Disability Federal & Postal Employees: Different Arguments
    • OPM Accepted Medical Conditions
    • FERS Medical Disability Benefits: Weariness
    • Attorney Representation for OPM Disability Claims: Foundations
    • Medical Retirement for Federal Employees: Getting Started
    • FERS Disability Retirement from OPM: Tomorrow and Beyond
    • Medical Retirement for Federal Workers: How to Use Percentage Designations

Disability Retirement for Federal Workers: The Danger of Forecasting

Posted on April 22, 2014 by Federal Disability Retirement Attorney

The accuracy of forecasting a future event is based upon the validity of present facts and information, and generated within a program of patterns relying upon past models.  But as present circumstances can change at any given moment, and unforeseen variables can alter the patterns modeled on previous occurrences, the science of forecasting can be a precarious venture into the foolish unknown.

For Federal and Postal employees preparing to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS or CSRS (although, as the latter category is becoming more of a rarity, one may forecast that in a decade or so, the designation of “CSRS” may well become expunged from the lexicon of recognizable acronyms; just another forecast).

Attempting to achieve some semblance of knowledge such that one can peacefully predict future outcomes is a natural desire; basing all hopes upon the certainty of a future forecast may be an act of monumental folly; the alternative is to have a balanced approach, and to recognize that the probability of a predicted outcome may approach a reasonable degree of certitude, but with potential pitfalls based upon unknown variables still to be encountered. Or, as most of us would do it, wet one’s forefinger, put it up into the air, and declare a bold prediction with little or no knowledge or factual basis upon which to rely.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: applying for disability in the postal service, attorney for opm disability retirement claims, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, denied fers disability retirement, disability benefits through usps, disability retirement assistance for federal employees, even the best federal disability attorneys will lose some cases once in a while, even the best fers disability retirement attorneys cannot win every case all the time, experience and reputation can make the difference in an opm disability claim but at the end eligibility decisions are made by opm representatives first and by mspb and federal judges later, explaining why it is simply impossible to guarantee how a federal disability retirement case will be resolved, federal disability retirement legal assistance, federal employee disability under fers, fers federal disability law blog, fers federal disability retirement application, how come lawyers can't please all the clients all the time, in a federal disability retirement case many factors are beyond any attorney's ability to fully know or control, knowledge in opm disability law increment chances of winning each case but at the end not all the cases are absolutely winnable, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyers can't guarantee winning all the opm disability retirement claims because they aren't the ultimate decision makers, legal representation for injured federal workers, making bold predictions about winning a federal disability retirement claim, no federal disability attorney can or should try to guarantee the outcome of a disability retirement case under either fers or csrs, no guarantees as to how a client's court cases will be resolved, opm disability law firm, postal service disability retirement, pursuing a disability retirement application, questions & answers about fers federal disability retirement, respectfully declining to guarantee winning a federal disability retirement case but promising to do the best of my abilities to secure eligibility, take into account the reputation of your legal advisor for opm disability retirement cases but take into account that at the end mspb and federal judges are who decide the fate of the applicant, the danger of forecasting the approval of a federal disability retirement case, the final decisions of federal disability retirement eligibility are made by opm representatives and mspb/federal judges, the reality is that no matter how good a federal disability retirement attorney is -- he or she can never guarantee you a particular result or outcome, the reason why this opm disability retirement law firm must respectfully decline to make disability retirement guarantees on administrative and court outcomes, why attorneys can't guarantee the outcome of a fers disability retirement court case, why this attorney doesn't guarantee that there is a 100% chance you'll get eligible | Leave a comment »

Disability Retirement for Federal Workers: Not Every Case

Posted on February 15, 2014 by Federal Disability Retirement Attorney

Not every case can be won.  Attorneys often like to present a positive face for each case, and should when there are clear merits to the unique set of facts and legal criteria applicable to any particular case; but the fact is, one can read of countless trials in newspapers, legal periodicals and electronic media, and realize that not all cases result in a verdict, settlement or conclusion favorable to the initiating litigant (one could, of course, argue that as there are always two or more parties to any legal controversy, that there is always a “winner” — just not you).

Whether because of unforeseen factual turns and twists; witnesses who blurted out something harmful without necessarily being true; an unsympathetic judge assigned; or, in a Federal Disability Retirement case, a doctor who turns out to be less than supportive than one first imagined; whatever the ultimate cause or reason, the plain fact is that there is no attorney in the universe who can offer an unmitigated guarantee to the outcome of any given case.

The best which can be done is to provide an objective assessment; an explanation of the law; a sound description of the legal process; and an effort which rises above the level of mere competency.

For Federal and Postal employees contemplating filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, selection of an attorney to represent one’s interests may be a critical factor for one’s future.

Ultimately, however, it is the Federal or Postal employee who, in his or her “heart of hearts”, will know the strength, validity and merits of one’s own case; and while not every case is meant to be won, it is nevertheless a truism in Federal Disability Retirement law that the majority of cases truly have merit, and that truth will prevail in the end.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: applying for disability in the postal service, attorney for civil service disability claims, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, csrs disability retirement guidance, disability retirement assistance for federal employees, even the best federal disability attorneys will lose some cases once in a while, even the best opm disability retirement lawyers cannot win every case all the time, experience and reputation can make the difference in an opm disability claim but at the end eligibility decisions are made by opm representatives first and by mspb and federal judges later, explaining why it is simply impossible to guarantee how a federal disability retirement case will be resolved, federal disability retirement legal assistance, federal employee disability under fers, Federal OPM Disability, federal service workman's comp, fers federal disability law blog, fers federal disability retirement application, filing disability with the postal service, how come lawyers can't please all the clients all the time, in a federal disability retirement case many factors are beyond any attorney's ability to fully know or control, just denied for fers disability retirement, knowledge in opm disability law increment chances of winning each case but at the end not all the cases are absolutely winnable, law firm opm disability, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, law firm serving disabled federal workers all across america, lawyers can't guarantee winning all the opm disability retirement claims because they aren't the ultimate decision makers, legal representation for injured federal workers, no federal disability attorney can or should try to guarantee the outcome of a disability retirement case under either fers or csrs, no guarantees as to how a client's court cases will be resolved, opm disability law firm, OPM disability retirement, owcp and opm federal government, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, pursuing a disability retirement application, questions & answers about fers federal disability retirement, respectfully declining to guarantee winning a federal disability retirement case but promising to do the best of my abilities to secure eligibility, take into account the reputation of your legal advisor for opm disability retirement cases but take into account that at the end mspb and federal judges are who decide the fate of the applicant, the best representation of federal employees from any us government agency, the final decisions of federal disability retirement eligibility are made by opm representatives and mspb/federal judges, the reality is that no matter how good a federal disability retirement attorney is -- he or she can never guarantee you a particular result or outcome, the reason why this opm disability retirement law firm must respectfully decline to make disability retirement guarantees on administrative and court outcomes, usps fers disability retirement, why attorneys can't guarantee the outcome of a fers disability retirement court case | Leave a comment »

FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement for Federal and USPS Workers: Reputation

Posted on February 13, 2014 by Federal Disability Retirement Attorney

Reputations are made or broken based upon winning or losing; in the modern age, where presentations of personal and professional credentials and accomplishments are pasted throughout the electronic and technological media without much thought or foresight, one can come to have a skewed idea of one’s self and image.

This is an unforgiving age; one’s reputation, which may have been built over years and decades, can easily be undermined by a single loss, an accusation, or a criticism triggered in anger.

For Federal and Postal Workers who must file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is understandable that because one’s Federal Disability Retirement case may be the basis for securing one’s future, that failing to secure the benefit will result in anger and dismay.

Unfortunately, not every case can be won.

In a perfect world, it would be a welcomed result to be able to conclude that one’s record of success is without blemish.  But in this imperfect world, where a doctor may hesitate to support a case; where adverse actions by an agency may play a greater role than first thought; or where an MSPB Judge may place greater weight upon the testimony of non-supportive evidence over that which should have been sufficient to meet the preponderance of the evidence test; sometimes, cases can be lost despite the best, honest and forthright efforts of everyone involved.

In the end, however, it is merely a loss to the Federal or Postal employee attempting to get Federal Disability Retirement benefits.  What efforts were made are quickly forgotten; blame must be assigned; anger must be vented.

Not every case can be won, but only the effort to be expended, and this can only be determined over time and the extended duration of one’s reputation over such time.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Attorney | Tagged: a federal disability retirement strategy based on many years of experience and not on magic words and spellings, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, attorneys can't guarantee winning all the opm disability retirement claims because they aren't the ultimate decision makers: the final decisions are made by opm representatives and mspb/federal judges, civil service disability retirement, considering the reputation of your legal advisor for opm disability retirement cases but take into account that at the end mspb and federal judges are who decide the fate of the applicant, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, even the best federal disability attorneys will lose some cases once in a while, even the best opm disability retirement lawyers cannot win every case all the time, experience and reputation can make the difference in an opm disability claim but at the end eligibility decisions are made by opm representatives first and by mspb and federal judges later, explaining why it is simply impossible to guarantee how a federal disability retirement case will be resolved, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal employee disability, FERS disability lawyer, in a federal disability retirement case many factors are beyond any attorney's ability to fully know or control, knowledge and experience in fers disability law increment chances of winning each case but at the end not all the cases are absolutely winnable, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal representation for injured federal workers, making predictions or even guarantees as to how a client's court cases will be resolved, nationwide representation of federal employees, no federal disability attorney can or should try to guarantee the outcome of a disability retirement case under either fers or csrs, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, respectfully declining to guarantee winning a federal disability retirement case but promising to do the best of my abilities to secure eligibility, the fallacy of the perfect federal disability retirement case, the reality is that no matter how good a federal disability retirement attorney is -- he or she can never guarantee you a particular result or outcome, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, why attorneys can't please all the clients all the time, why lawyers can't guarantee the outcome of a fers disability retirement court case, why this opm disability retirement attorney must respectfully decline to make disability retirement guarantees on administrative and court outcomes | Leave a comment »

  • More on CSRS & FERS Disability Retirement

    • eZineArticles.com Article: The 1 Year Statute of Limitations
    • Federal Disability Retirement Laws, Medical Conditions, and the Intersecting Complications with OWCP, Social Security and FERS & CSRS
    • Federal Disability Retirement: The Full Arsenal of Weapons
    • FedSmith.com Article: Revisiting "Accommodation"
    • FedSmith.com Article: Sometimes the Process is just as important as the Substance of an Argument
    • Latest PostalReporter.com Article: Causation in a Federal Disability Retirement Case
    • Understanding the Complexities of the Law
    • USPS Disability Blog: The National Reassessment Program, the Agency and the Worker
  • Other Resources for Federal and Postal Employees

    • Articles Published in the Postal Reporter
    • FAQs on OPM Disability Retirement
    • FERS Disability Attorney Profile at Lawyers.com
    • Main Website on Federal Disability Retirement
    • OPM Disability Blog
    • The Postal Service Disability Retirement Blog
  • Seven False Myths about OPM Disability Retirement

    1) I have to be totally disabled to get Postal or Federal disability retirement.
    False: You are eligible for disability retirement so long as you are unable to perform one or more of the essential elements of your job.  Thus, it is a much lower standard of disability. 

    2) My injury or illness has to be job-related.
    False: You can get disability even if your condition is not work related.  If your medical condition impacts your ability to perform any of the core elements of your job, you are eligible, regardless of how or where your condition occurred.

    3) I have to quit my federal job first to get disability.
    False: In most cases, you can apply while continuing to work at your present job, to the extent you are able.  

    4) I can't get disability if I suffer from a mental or nervous condition.
    False: If your condition affects your job performance, you can still qualify. Psychiatric conditions are treated no differently from physical conditions.

    5) Disability retirement is approved by DOL Workers Comp.
    False: It's the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) the federal agency that administers and approves disability for employees at the US Postal Service or other federal agencies.

    6) I can wait for OPM disability retirement for many years after separation.
    False: You only have one year from the date of separation from service - otherwise, you lose your right forever.

    7) If I get disability retirement, I won't be able to apply for Scheduled Award (SA).
    False: You can get a Scheduled Award under the rules of OWCP even after you get approved for OPM disability retirement.
  • Calendar

    March 2021
    S M T W T F S
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
    « Feb    
  • Archives

    • March 2021 (5)
    • February 2021 (24)
    • January 2021 (26)
    • December 2020 (28)
    • November 2020 (26)
    • October 2020 (27)
    • September 2020 (26)
    • August 2020 (26)
    • July 2020 (28)
    • June 2020 (26)
    • May 2020 (26)
    • April 2020 (26)
    • March 2020 (26)
    • February 2020 (25)
    • January 2020 (27)
    • December 2019 (28)
    • November 2019 (27)
    • October 2019 (27)
    • September 2019 (25)
    • August 2019 (27)
    • July 2019 (28)
    • June 2019 (23)
    • May 2019 (27)
    • April 2019 (26)
    • March 2019 (26)
    • February 2019 (24)
    • January 2019 (28)
    • December 2018 (27)
    • November 2018 (27)
    • October 2018 (27)
    • September 2018 (25)
    • August 2018 (27)
    • July 2018 (27)
    • June 2018 (26)
    • May 2018 (27)
    • April 2018 (22)
    • March 2018 (26)
    • February 2018 (24)
    • January 2018 (27)
    • December 2017 (26)
    • November 2017 (27)
    • October 2017 (26)
    • September 2017 (26)
    • August 2017 (27)
    • July 2017 (26)
    • June 2017 (26)
    • May 2017 (28)
    • April 2017 (25)
    • March 2017 (27)
    • February 2017 (24)
    • January 2017 (26)
    • December 2016 (29)
    • November 2016 (26)
    • October 2016 (26)
    • September 2016 (26)
    • August 2016 (27)
    • July 2016 (26)
    • June 2016 (26)
    • May 2016 (28)
    • April 2016 (26)
    • March 2016 (27)
    • February 2016 (25)
    • January 2016 (26)
    • December 2015 (25)
    • November 2015 (24)
    • October 2015 (27)
    • September 2015 (25)
    • August 2015 (26)
    • July 2015 (28)
    • June 2015 (26)
    • May 2015 (25)
    • April 2015 (25)
    • March 2015 (26)
    • February 2015 (22)
    • January 2015 (26)
    • December 2014 (27)
    • November 2014 (22)
    • October 2014 (26)
    • September 2014 (26)
    • August 2014 (26)
    • July 2014 (27)
    • June 2014 (25)
    • May 2014 (26)
    • April 2014 (26)
    • March 2014 (26)
    • February 2014 (24)
    • January 2014 (27)
    • December 2013 (25)
    • November 2013 (25)
    • October 2013 (26)
    • September 2013 (26)
    • August 2013 (27)
    • July 2013 (27)
    • June 2013 (25)
    • May 2013 (27)
    • April 2013 (26)
    • March 2013 (26)
    • February 2013 (24)
    • January 2013 (26)
    • December 2012 (26)
    • November 2012 (25)
    • October 2012 (26)
    • September 2012 (23)
    • August 2012 (27)
    • July 2012 (22)
    • June 2012 (26)
    • May 2012 (24)
    • April 2012 (25)
    • March 2012 (25)
    • February 2012 (25)
    • January 2012 (25)
    • December 2011 (26)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (26)
    • September 2011 (25)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (26)
    • May 2011 (25)
    • April 2011 (25)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (22)
    • January 2011 (23)
    • December 2010 (25)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (25)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (25)
    • July 2010 (28)
    • June 2010 (26)
    • May 2010 (29)
    • April 2010 (30)
    • March 2010 (26)
    • February 2010 (22)
    • January 2010 (23)
    • December 2009 (20)
    • November 2009 (19)
    • October 2009 (22)
    • September 2009 (18)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (23)
    • June 2009 (18)
    • May 2009 (11)
    • April 2009 (11)
    • March 2009 (14)
    • February 2009 (10)
    • January 2009 (10)
    • December 2008 (8)
    • November 2008 (8)
    • October 2008 (6)
    • September 2008 (4)
    • August 2008 (9)
    • July 2008 (8)
    • June 2008 (6)
    • May 2008 (18)
    • April 2008 (20)
    • March 2008 (31)

Blog at WordPress.com. WP Designer.