Having a sense of shame can reveal a heightened level of moral superiority; but as with all things emanating from the Good, those who lack a sensitivity to propriety will take full advantage of a misguided loyalty to ethical conduct. Work and a duty to one’s vocation is a guiding principle for most Federal and Postal employees. That is precisely why filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, is anathema to the Federal and Postal employee.
The committed Federal and Postal employee often has a warped and misguided sense of his ethical duty to work, and will allow for a medical condition to continue to exacerbate and debilitate, at the expense of one’s deteriorating health, all for the sake of commitment, devotion, and high ethical sense of duty to one’s mission for the agency.
Supervisors and managers recognize this, and take full advantage. But the Federal and Postal employee must by necessity understand that Federal Disability Retirement is a benefit accorded to all Federal and Postal employees precisely for the underlying reasons offered: When a medical condition impacts one’s health such that one can no longer perform all of the essential elements of one’s job, the benefit of Federal Disability Retirement is meant to be accessed precisely because it has always been part of the benefits package for all Federal and Postal employees, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Commitment to a mission is indeed commendable; blind devotion at the expense of one’s own health is somewhat less so — unless one counts the sneering approval of agencies who see such sacrifices as mere paths to the slaughterhouse.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a few useful assumption and realistic expectations before you take the federal disability retirement train, a loyalty towards a federal agency should have its limitations when there is a disability that won't allow the employee to work in an efficient manner, a question of honor and allegiance: are we supposed to keep being loyal to an agency which has shown no empathy for its disabled employees when they cannot longer perform their current jobs, attorney experienced in dealing with fers disability retirement claims, can the opm take seriously the integrity of federal supervisors?, clashes between management and disabled employees at the us agencies, commitment of the us postal workers, commitment to your federal job at the expense of your well being, decline of genuine empathy after a disability in the workplace, disability and the federal sector and basing your hopes in realistic expectations, disability retirement from the opm and expecting integrity from managers and supervisors, don't always count with the support of an agency supervisor, expect the unexpected when you file for federal disability retirement benefits - a simple warning from an experienced federal disability retirement attorney, expecting bilateral loyalty from your federal employer, expecting ethical behavior from federal agencies, federal disability law firm, federal employees shouldn't apologize for medical benefits, FERS disability retirement, hoping for uncooperative neutrality from agency as a reasonably positive expectation, if postal managers will really support the ill injured postal worker, if your health is more important than your job, isn't good health one of the most important benefits we are willing to keep even at the expense of a good-paying federal or postal job that hurts your continually?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, no apologies for medical and social circumstances you can't control, not need to feel ashamed for applying for federal disability retirement benefits, postal and federal employees and their often blind commitment to the causes of their employing agencies, postal employment and no apologies for an earned medical benefits, pride or shame to admit a disability in the federal workplace, providing you with a realistic expectation for your fers disability claim, the injured federal worker and his high commitment to excellence, the lack of empathy in the federal workforce with those who suffer from not so obvious medical conditions, the loyalty of a federal agency toward its own employees, the main priority a federal agency is its mission not the welfare of an injured or disabled employee, the rehab federal worker and her commitment to duty, there is never a reason to feel ashamed for pursuing disability retirement under fers or csrs, what's more important for the injured postal worker money or good health?, when a loyal and dedicated postal worker gets hurt, when federal agencies only care about their ''missions'' | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Service Deficiency & Medical Condition
The Office of Personnel Management will often use as a criteria of denial the argument/basis that despite the fact that an individual may have a medical condition such that the medical documentation states that the Federal or Postal worker can no longer perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, nevertheless, there has not been a showing that a “service deficiency” has occurred. Often, agencies systematically write up performance appraisals without much thought or consideration; more often, Federal and Postal workers quietly suffer through his or her medical condition, and strive each day to meet the requirements of their duties.
Whatever the reason for the lack of attention or perception on the part of the supervisor or the agency to recognize that the Federal or Postal worker has not been able to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, such basis for a denial of a disability retirement application by the Office of Personnel Management is not a legitimate one, because existence of a “service deficiency” is not the whole story: if it is found that retention in the job is “inconsistent” with the type of medical condition the Federal or Postal Worker has, then such a finding would “trump” the lack of any service deficiency. That is not something, however, that the Office of Personnel Management is likely to tell you as they deny your disability retirement application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Agency, OPM Disability Actors - The Supervisor, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: adverse agency reaction, agency's extraordinary top assessment in fers disability applications, agency's influence in disability retirement, assessment for postal disability retirement from supervisor, criteria of denial instead of criteria of disability in opm disability, disability retirement csrs, disability retirement usps non job related, disability retirement workers compensation, essential elements of jobs not so essential according to evaluation, federal disability facts, federal disability law firm, federal medical retirement, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability attorney, fers disability attorney in mississippi, fers disability benefits, government postal disability, injured postal workers and their miraculous job evaluations, law firm for federal disability retirement, medical disability lawyers opm, opm disability and the supervisor who says everything's fine, opm disability for federal employees in louisiana, opm disability for federal workers in alabama, opm disability retirement representation in utah, opm supervisor statement disability retirement, opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp medical retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal service medical retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, representing us government disability employees anywhere, the incapacitated federal employee without service deficiency, USPS disability retirement benefits, washington state federal opm disability retirement, when supervisors don't notice any medical condition in federal worker, when the agency claims no service deficiency in opm application, when there is no accommodation because there is no job deficiency, when top performance hurts the chances of getting fers disability, when work performance evaluations are near too perfect, Workers Comp disability, workers comp fers retirement, your supervisor and federal disability retirement | Leave a comment »