Often, there is a concern about medical conditions which one suffers from, which “predate” employment in the Federal Sector, or with the U.S. Postal Service. Such conditions are often identified as “preexisting medical conditions” — meaning, thereby, that they exist prior to an event.
In the context of OWCP (Federal Worker’s Compensation), under the aegis of the Department of Labor, such an issue normally involves the assertion and allegation (by the Department of Labor, Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs) that a Medical Condition-X already existed prior to Event-Y — the latter normally constituting the “on-the-job” accident or occurrence, or an occupational disease, etc. Because causation — the “what caused the injury” issue — is important in OWCP/DOL cases, the concern of preexisting conditions is normally a point of contention between the Federal worker and the Federal Government/Department of Labor.
However, in OPM Disability Retirement cases, because causation is not an “issue” of concern (the “how” or “where” it happened is not a relevant legal criteria of proof), it rarely becomes a point of conflict between the Office of Personnel Management and the Federal or Postal employee.
It can become of interest, however, for the Office of Personnel Management, in a Federal Disability Retirement application, if a Federal or Postal worker has been hired and working in a particular job, with a specific medical condition for many years, successfully, but then files for Federal Disability Retirement benefits. The reason it may become of some interest, however, is not as to the “causation” issue (of the “how” or “where” it happened), but rather, to the question: Why is it that the Federal or Postal employee who has had a Medical Condition-X all of these years can now claim not to be able to perform Essential Elements Y & Z now?
That is the point where a medical condition existing prior to one’s Federal or Postal employment may be of some interest to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. It is, however, easily addressed; it just needs to be discussed in the right way.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a poor excuse from the opm to deny medical benefits: preexisting conditions, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, causality issues in federal workers comp and disability retirement, compensation for federal employees with not job-related injuries, difficulty in getting feca owcp versus opm disability, disability not accepted as a job-related illness usps, disability retirement at the USPS, federal owcp, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement and the "pre-existing" condition, federal employee's injury aggravated by an underlying pre-existing condition, FERS disability retirement, if your opm disability claim is denied because condition existed prior federal employment, lack of work for usps workers with medical restrictions, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lightblue postal information owcp gov, medical causation not an issue under fers csrs disability retirement, nationwide representation of federal employees, notes on illness causation and situation disability for federal employees, OPM disability doesn't have to be job-related, OPM disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, potential problems in my fers disability claim, preexisting conditions, problems that are not really problems for the potential opm disability applicants, qualifying for federal disability retirement, resources for ill or injured federal workers with no job-related conditions, resources for injured federal workers, USPS disability retirement benefits, workers comp disapproved due to preexisting condition, working full duty after job-related injury | Leave a comment »