There is a conceptual and legal distinction to be made between an Agency’s “accommodations”, as used in a loose, non-technical manner, and being “accommodated” in accordance with the laws, regulations and statutes governing Federal Disability Retirement under FERS or CSRS, and as intended in usage on Standard Form 3112D, Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for the Office of Personnel Management.
Often, when a Federal or Postal employee becomes injured (whether on the job or while on vacation is an irrelevancy for purposes of Federal Disability Retirement eligibility), the Agency will attempt to lessen the workload, allow the Federal or Postal employee to work in a modified manner, allow for “light duty” assignments, or even temporarily suspend certain essential elements of one’s job (travel, heavy lifting, required overtime, e.g., etc.), and such efforts on the part of the Agency are commendable, allowable, and perfectly within the acceptable structures of law.
Such efforts by the Agency are often referred to loosely as an attempt to “accommodate” the Federal or Postal employee’s medical conditions, and indeed, it is a correct (but non-legal and non-technical) use of the term. It is not, in terms of legal sufficiency, an “accommodation” to the extent that the narrow definition of what it means to be “accommodated” under the law is that an agency will provide an accommodation such that the Federal or Postal employee, with the accommodation, will be able to perform all of the essential elements of what the position requires.
Lessening the duties temporarily, or suspending certain essential elements of the job for a prescribed period of time, does not allow for the Federal or Postal employee to perform those essential elements of the job, and therefore is not technically an “accommodation”. That is why most accommodations are not accommodations at all, and as such, those accommodating actions by the agency do not preclude a Federal or Postal employee to file for, and be eligible for, Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty | Tagged: accommodation of federal employees, blogs owcp and opm disability issues, civil service disability, civil service eeoc and accommodation issues, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, essential elements of jobs, federal employee reassignment work program, federal job reassignment letter and your disability, federal workers with serious illnesses, FERS Disability, FERS disability retirement, if reassignment is not possible for the light duty federal worker, legal accommodation for Postal workers, light duty and reasonable accommodation, listing essential elements an essential element in application, OPM disability retirement, owcp accommodations, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal worker not getting accommodation needed, reasonable accommodation of federal workers, Standard Form 3112D, the postal service's influence on disability matters through the sf 3112d, usps accommodation, USPS disability retirement, usps disability retirement blog, why in opm disability law most accommodations are not accommodations | Leave a comment »