In some ways, the fact that each “stage” of the process of Federal Disability Retirement is independent from each other, is a “given”. When a Federal Disability Retirement application is denied at the Initial Stage of the process, then again at the Reconsideration Stage of the process, it is considered a positive part of the administrative process that the Merit Systems Protection Board will evaluate and decide the case “de novo”, or “anew” or “afresh”, without regard to what the Office of Personnel Management stated, decided, affirmed or concluded.
To that extent — to have an independent eye and an evaluation unbiased by prior analysis — is a good thing. However, when one reads the decision of the Office of Personnel Management at the Initial denial of the application, then again at the Reconsideration denial of the application, it is somewhat disconcerting that neither OPM Representatives relied upon the analysis of the other. What this allows for, of course, is an independent review by both the Initial Stage of the application and the Reconsideration Stage of the application, and while such independence of review can be seen in a positive light (again, that one OPM Representative is not influenced or biased by the views of the other), more often than not, what happens is that the Reconsideration Stage OPM Representative merely comes up with new and previously unfounded arguments upon which to deny the application a second time.
In short, it is difficult to stabilize the arguments upon which OPM relies, in order to answer and refute them. That is why the MSPB’s approach of viewing a case de novo is important. For, by ignoring the malleability of OPM’s reviewing process, one may get an objective and truly independent analysis and evaluation of the case. Independence is an important component of “fairness”; objectivity is an integral element; and integrity is the filament which holds the law together.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process | Tagged: a new look at your federal disability claim, a new opportunity to get approved for disability in each stage of the federal disability process, accepting opm disability clients all across america, an attorney who will represent you during the mspb hearing, an independent review of the first two opm decisions, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, considering an attorney with experience before the mspb, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, de novo process in OPM disability law, each stage of the federal disability application process, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement denied and in mspb appeal, getting the mspb involved after two denials from the opm, most mspb are fair with regard to opm disability cases, MSPB disability lawyer, MSPB Third Stage, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, the independence of each stage of the fers disability retirement process, the relative fairness of the opm disability process, understanding each stage of the OPM disability retirement process, USPS disability retirement, when you need to involve the MSPB in disability claim | Leave a comment »