As with most things in life, preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS from the Office of Personnel Management is an engagement of a process which should be affirmatively sought without delay. Delay and procrastination results in further compounding the complexities which result from a medical condition.
Dealing with a medical condition while attempting to perform all of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal position is complex enough; when it becomes apparent that one’s medical condition will last for a minimum of 12 months, and further, that one or more of the essential elements of one’s job can no longer be performed as a result of the medical condition, then it is time to consider filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.
The cumulative effect of delay and procrastination becomes progressively compounded in both complexity and unintended consequences: the Agency begins to put greater pressure as work has to be shifted to others; greater mistrust arises; Agencies begin to react with adverse, punitive measures, such as imposing unreasonable leave restrictions, placing an individual on a PIP, proposing suspensions and other adverse actions; all of which results in greater anxiety and exacerbation of one’s medical conditions, which become deleteriously impacted because of the health, financial and professional pressures felt.
Unless a delay upon making a decision in preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS is “planned” — for a viable, reasonable and rationally-based purpose — such delay and procrastination will only accelerate and compound the problems of one’s life. The benefit of a medical retirement under FERS or CSRS was created and offered by the Federal Service for a specific purpose. It is well to embrace that purpose with purposefulness.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: adverse agency action, affirmative approach for OPM disability retirement, approaching an opm case in an affirmative manner, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, essential elements of jobs, FERS disability retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, formulating a fers disability claims takes a big deal of effort and dedication, how to formulate and approach a fers disability application, medical condition that will last 12 months or more, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability retirement and suspension of the case, postal service disability retirement, procrastinating the opm disability filing, taking an affirmative approach with your medical condition, the best way to formulate an usps disability retirement claim, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, usps suspensions and other attendance issues while in sick leave, when the agency seeks non-adversarial removal, why procrastination won't help your federal employee disability retirement filing | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement 
Federal Disability Retirement: Formulating an Effective SF 3112A
The “heart of it all” is… The medical report will provide the substantive basis; a supervisor’s statement may or may not be helpful or useful at all; legal arguments will certainly place the viability of the application for Federal Disability Retirement into its proper context and arguments which touch upon the legal basis will inevitably have their weight, impact and effect upon whether one has met by a preponderance of the evidence the legal criteria required to be eligible and entitled. All of that aside, the SF 3112A — the Applicant’s Statement of Disability — is where the heart of the matter resides in preparing, formulating, and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS.
If a Federal or Postal employee is unsure of what to state, how to state it, or how much to reveal and state, that becomes a problem. For, ultimately, the proper balance must be stricken — between that which is relevant as opposed to superfluous; between that which is substantive as opposed to self-defeating; and between that which is informational, as opposed to compelling. Formulation takes thought and reflection. Yes, the SF 3112A — the Applicant’s Statement of Disability — is the heart of it all.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: an essential tip for 3112a filling: keep in mind the requirements, attorney's legal assistance during the 3112a filling out, beware of the applicant's statement of disability, federal disability law and legal argumentation, fers disability application supervisor comments, finding the right balance in the opm disability applicant's statements, focusing on the narrative of the opm disability applicant, formulating a fers disability claims takes a big deal of effort and dedication, heart and soul of a federal employee disability application, How to write a SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability, importance of using legal argumentation in your fers disability claim, legal arguments in the federal disability application, maintaining a fine balance in your statements in the applicant's statements, medical report from treating physicians for fers disability claim, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement application, narrative medical reports used in the federal disability retirement process, objectivity and legal arguments in a fers disability claim, opm disability statements made by applicant, postal supervisors and managers, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, soundness of legal arguments used in administrative law, striving for a fair balance in sf 3112a the applicant's statements, studying your opm claim and using appropriate legal arguments, telling the medical story in the applicant's statement of disability, the applicant's control of the opm disability application and process, the applicant's medical narrative report, the best sample of a 3112a -- on that meets the basic requirements of eligibility, the limited importance of the supervisor's statements in the opm disability process, the limited power of a supervisor in the fers disability retirement process, the most important form in the federal disability retirement package: sf 3112a, the opm disability retirement applicant's errors, the supervisor's opinions during the federal disability process, tips for unrepresented opm disability applicants, what the applicant can control in the fers disability package, why the applicant's statements is such an important document in a fers disability claim | Leave a comment »