Within the world of biology, the distinction between an unicellular eukaryote and a prokaryote is one defined by the absence of a distinct, membrane-bound nucleus. The latter is thus without a homunculus, constrained by a parameter and protected as the central seat of control. One would assume that, because of this, the former would be easier to genetically manipulate, while the former would be more difficult.
Similarly, while widespread dissemination of responsibility and delegation of authority may have the positive effect of getting much work done, the corollary negative impact may also become uncontrollably representative of an organization: loss of qualitative control.
Upon reading a denial letter from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, one may begin to suspect that you are dealing with a prokaryote-type of entity: for anything may be said, and what may be stated may not even remotely be the law of the case.
Being unconstrained by a membrane may have its advantages for survival; being unconcerned by the constraints of language will have its definite impact upon a Federal or Postal employee attempting to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management: confusion for the Federal or Postal Worker, or worse, surrender and retreat. But there are ways to counter such an untethered approach — but one which must use all of the legal tools available to the Federal or Postal applicant.
The key is to build a membrane and change the prokaryote into an eukaryote. In order to do this, however, one must know the law, apply the law, and force the law upon the organism — thereby effectuating the genetic modification. Thus does science, logic and law coalesce into a unified, rational whole. Go figure.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: assertion of power and authority over fers disability retirement matters, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, authority to interpret the law under fers or csrs disability retirement, Civil Service Retirement System, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, don't believe the excuses opm uses to deny your federal disability claim, excuses the opm disability specialist uses to deny disability benefits, Federal Disability, FERS Disability, focusing on the substantive issues of an opm denial letter, groundless reason for disability application denial, know the medical terminology your physician uses in your opm disability claim, knowledge and experience to represent disabled federal employees, law, lawyer federal retirement disability, legal authority on opm disability retirement law, legal knowledge and core competency of opm disability laws, misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability law, OPM disability attorney, OPM First Stage Disability Application, opm's authority over the federal disability retirement process, opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement, opmkaryote, retaining an attorney knowledgeable in fers/csrs disability law, statutes and regulations governing disability retirement law, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the authority to interpret and administer opm disability law, the chain of authority to decide the fate of the federal disability retirement application, The Denial at the First Stage, the dreaded denial letter, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the statutes and regulations of administrative law, the world of biology and Federal Disability Retirement law, United States Office of Personnel Management, when opm disability retirement specialists expose their knowledge of opm disability law, when the opm's decision is unreasonable, working around an opm denial letter | Leave a comment »