In preparing, formulating and completing a Federal Disability Retirement packet under FERS & CSRS for the Office of Personnel Management, it is important to always be the initiator of all issues, real, implicit or potentially existing. Nothing should ever be “hidden”. To hide is to admit that something is wrong; to paraphrase a Shakespearean verse, to object too strenuously is to admit to something that you think needs objecting to. Or, to put it in elementary terms, honesty is always the best policy.
Aside from the obvious penalties for lying upon a Federal Application for Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, there is the practical reason: rarely is an issue of such ominous importance that it would preclude a Federal or Postal employee from obtaining Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS. Certainly, some issues can become temporary impediments; other issues — often relating to performance issues, misconduct during Federal Service, a perception that an employee did something “wrong” — will lead a potential applicant for Federal Disability Retirement benefits to “color the truth” in an application for Federal Disability Retirement. There is no need. Certainly, some issues need to be highlighted more than others, and other issues need to be left in the periphery; but openness is the best policy, and honesty is always the only avenue to success. It is merely how you state it, that matters.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: being truthful but being careful in what you say, civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement federal law enforcement, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, FERS disability lawyer, handicap postal employees and unfair charges of ''misconduct'', honesty always pays off, honesty is always the best policy, important and peripheral medical issues in the fers csrs disability application, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, making no major issue is left hidden in the federal disability application, misconduct allegations against the disabled federal employee, Office of Personnel Management (OPM), office of personnel management usps disability, OPM disability retirement, OPM Reconsideration Stage, owcp disability retirement, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp post office, penalties for lying in a fers disability application, performance issues during the opm disability application, Postal disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, taking a leading role in the process of your opm disability application, taking charge of your future after fers disability, telling the truth does pay in a csrs or fers disability claim, The Importance of Your Credibility in an OPM Disability Application, USPS Disability, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, when the postal employee is accused of wrongdoing, your credibility on the federal disability application | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Agency Supervisors & Their Responsibility
Agency Supervisors possess powers which can be easily misused. As such, the Supervisor who must fill out a Supervisor’s Statement — Standard Form 3112B — for the disability retirement applicant, must do so with care, integrity, and a sense of reasoned perspective and fairness. “But I’m only telling the truth of what I believe,” is often the justification of a Supervisor who deliberately inserts damaging, self-serving and derogatory remarks on the Supervisor’s Statement. But such “truth” goes beyond the proper role of a Supervisor. Indeed, it is often helpful to discuss the content of intended remarks and statements with the Federal or Postal employee first. Such consultation provides a true and balanced opportunity — a field of fairness and a reasoned perspective — to ensure that a Supervisor is indeed being fair, balanced, and neutral, and not allowing for any personal “feelings” of acrimony or animosity to dilute and pollute a fair appraisal of an employee’s performance, conduct, and impact upon the Agency’s purpose, mission, and goals intended and accomplished. For, ultimately, a Supervisor’s Statement is not about what a Supervisor’s “belief” is; it is not about whether the Supervisor likes or dislikes a Federal or Postal employee; rather, it is supposed to be a balanced, objective perspective delineating the impact of a Federal or Postal employee’s performance or conduct, relative to his or her medical condition and the ability of that employee to perform the essential elements of a job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions | Tagged: abusive postal supervisors plague the workplace, attorney representing federal employees, avoiding deception during the federal disability application, disability retirement fers, disability retirement usps, essential elements of jobs, federal disability message boards, federal disability retirement blog, federal supervisor response to employee work injury, federal supervisors abuse of power, federal supervisors lies and half lies, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability retirement, filing a supervisor's opm statement with care and integrity, harassment is not a medical issue, honesty always pays off, if your boss tries to hurt your federal disability application, it's all about work disability and job performance, letter carriers disability retirement, light duty accommodation versus disability retirement, limited duty assignments united states postal service, mail carrier injury on the job, medical compensation for federal and postal workers, Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements, notifying the supervisor/agency, OPM disability retirement, personal injury at federal jobs, post office application for disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal supervisors and managers, postal workers injured on the job, retaliation against the injured ill federal employee worker, rural carrier on job injury, SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement, Standard Form 3112b, supervisors and disabled employees in the US federal agencies, supervisors' revenge against Postal workers, the injured federal worker and the unfair supervisor, the venom of the supervisor, US Postal Disability, USPS disability retirement, usps workers compensation disability, when supervisors treat federal workers with dignity and respect, when the supervisor files the form with fairness and balance, work abuse at the US Postal Service | Leave a comment »