How one views a case often determines the approach which is undertaken. Thus, if the belief is that preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is merely a simple administrative process which requires the compilation of the medical documentation, answering some questions and filling out some forms, then such a belief will determine the extent of preparation of a Federal Disability Retirement application.
The other side of the perspective, however, is held by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. OPM views every Federal Disability Retirement application based upon a multitude of criteria: legal sufficiency; consistency of statement-to-evidence; weight of medical documentation; analytical comparison to what the agency states; a review of the composite of forms, documents and statements made, etc.
Is OPM’s approach an adversarial one? One often hears that such administrative and bureaucratic processes are “non-adversarial” in nature, but what exactly does that mean? If the perspective of the Office of Personnel Management is to apply a legal criteria in order to determine the legal sufficiency of a Federal Disability Retirement application, doesn’t that make it into an adversarial process?
Euphemisms are invaluable tools in the utilization of language as a means of communication; but words ultimately must have a static meaning — at least for the duration of the sentence to be uttered. That being the case, one must conclude that how one perceives a case should be based upon the meaning of language used in describing the case; and the meaning is quite clear in preparing, formulating, filing, and awaiting a decision of a Federal Disability Retirement application from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, careful walking in the path toward federal disability retirement, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, determining the strength of your federal disability claim, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, how hard is to get federal disability retirement benefits?, how you perceive the strength of your fers disability case will determine first the effort and then the ultimate success of your claim, if only federal disability retirement was a 'piece of cake', law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal knowledge and core competency of opm disability laws, looking at your federal disability retirement claim with one foot on the ground, looking at your opm disability application with the eyes of the federal disability claims examiner, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, perception versus knowledge of the strength of a federal disability retirement case, perception vs. reality about the federal disability retirement application, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, taking a second view of the fers disability process from a different angle, the harsh reality of a complex but extremely necessary disability retirement process, the strength of a fers disability retirement application, USPS disability retirement, your financial stability may depend on how you first look at that federal disability application | Leave a comment »