In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS & CSRS, one is often asked (and should also ask of one’s self) the following question: What does it take to be eligible? What proof proves my case? How much proof must I submit (quantity) and is the proof I submit sufficient (quality)? All of these questions fall under a generic rubric in law, termed as “burden of proof“.
Every legal process — and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS is no different — applies a legal standard: a set of criteria in determining whether or not a Federal or Postal Worker is eligible for — qualifies for — Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.
In applying a statutory set of criteria, there is the general application of what constitutes, or meets the needs of, the evidence, documents, and proof that is submitted for review. The overriding standard that is supposed to be applied for determining the process, is a standard of law called, “Preponderance of the evidence.” It is a relatively low standard used in civil law — where, if the proof submitted shows that it is more likely so than not so, then one has met “by a preponderance of the evidence” that a Federal or Postal employee is entitled to Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
Does this standard apply at the administrative level — at the Office of Personnel Management? The answer is “Yes”, but not necessarily consciously. One only effectively argues that the standard of proof has been met when one encounters a Judge — at the Merit Systems Protection Board. But, nevertheless, OPM is supposed to follow “the law” and the burden of proof, and it is simply one more argument that one can, and should, make to the Office of Personnel Management when filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under either FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof | Tagged: Burden of Proof, civil service disability, civil service disability retirement, civilian medical retirement benefits, criteria needed to prove federal employee disability, different laws and standards of disability, disability retirement at the USPS, do I have to prove to the owcp that I am severely incapacitated?, documentation required to prove disability to the office of personnel management, federal medical retirement, fers disability blog, fers disability retirement and the burden of proof concept, how does the federal employee applicant proves he is eligible for medical retirement?, how to get approved for federal employee disability benefits, how to get disability from the post office, how to get medical retirement from the po, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal representation for injured federal workers, legal standards must be met during the opm disability process, limited burden of proof shift over to OPM, medical personnel records from the federal employer, MSPB disability lawyer, opm disability retirement blog, opm medical retirement standards, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability retirement, statutory legal standard of disability or impairment, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, telling the medical story in the applicant's statement of disability, the burden of proof concept in opm disability, the standard of proof, what criteria needs to be met to prove opm disability?, what does it take to qualify for postal disability?, what does the federal employee must do to prove to management his too sick to work?, what kind of paperwork do I need to show I need to medically retire from the government, what medical evidence is needed for an opm claim? | Leave a comment »
