Often, when one has been embroiled in a prolonged battle with another person, an organization, agency, etc., the embattled state itself takes on a life of its own, and decisions which should be based upon a rational perspective, what is in one’s best interest, etc., are cast aside. That is why divorce proceedings — ones which involve little children — are such traumatic events to witness. But domestic relations litigation is not the only type of proceedings which tear at one’s soul.
Often, a Federal or Postal employee will be involved in countless years of procedural and administrative litigation — including EEO filings, formal grievances, lawsuits filed in Federal courts, etc. — which take their toll upon one’s family, one’s career, and one’s health. Sometimes, the engagement of litigation becomes a way of life, and the daily turmoil constitutes the norm by which one lives.
When one’s health is impacted, however, the Federal or Postal Worker who considers filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, will sometimes allow for the years of battle to cloud one’s judgment. While historical narratives concerning the background of one’s medical conditions may be somewhat appropriate in preparing and formulating one’s Federal Disability Retirement Applicant’s Statement of Disability, one should be cautious in filing a narrative of emotion — that exhaustive rant against a particular supervisor or coworker; against the agency; and against the world which has turned into an enemy of daily turmoil and emotional upheaval.
Focus upon the essence of a Federal Disability case. It may be time to leave behind that prolonged state of embattlement, and find a quiet spot in the pasture of one’s future, and enjoy a day of peace by securing one’s future with a Federal Disability Retirement annuity.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: a process that requires considerable mental and emotional effort, a rational perspective from your disability claim evaluation, an emotional vs. reasoned personal account of disability, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability retirement, collateral litigation and federal employee disability retirement with the us government, decision making based on rational medical issues, describing a medical tragedy without too much emotionalism, disability retirement at the USPS, emotional distress at the Post Office, essential elements of jobs, federal disability retirement, fers litigation and case laws on disability benefits, getting rid of emotional baggage during fers disability application, importance of the narrative report on opm disability, keep your emotions in check during the opm disability process, keeping emotions under control will help an opm disability applicant, keeping your tone cool and rational during application, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal requirements of the medical narrative report, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, reflecting on emotional tone from the legal angle, representing federal employees from any us government agency, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, sound decision-making in real-life health problems at the federal workplace, suppressing negative emotions before a major survival fight, telling your emotional story from an opm disability attorney's perspective, the applicant's medical narrative report, the emotional needs of the applicant and the sf 3112a, the fine balance between rational and emotional factors, USPS disability retirement, usps employment discrimination to postal workers with stress, when emotions affect our 'rational' thoughts, when personal emotions overtake rational thoughts during application process, writing a successful personal narrative report | Leave a comment »
Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Coherence
A Federal Disability Retirement packet must be coherent. This may appear to be “self-evident”, but there have been many disability retirement packets which, upon a denial and a review at the Second, Reconsideration Phase of the process, lack the coherent coordination which results in a credible disability retirement packet. Coherence results from the simple review of the entirety of the information submitted to the Office of Personnel Management: The applicant’s personal statement; the medical records and reports; the position description; any additional statements or attachments.
Now, there are certain elements of a Federal Disability Retirement application which cannot be controlled — such as the Supervisor’s Statement (SF 3112B) and the Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts (SF 3112D). However, while one may not be able to “control” the coherence of those elements which are the purview of the Agency, there are certain steps which can be taken to preempt such uncontrollable injections from the Agency.
Regardless, it is normally not the SF 3112B or 3112D which makes for the incoherence of a Federal Disability Retirement submission; more often than not, the culprit is the Applicant him/herself.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, agency's influence in disability retirement, agency's influence on the opm disability claim is limited, assessment for postal disability retirement from supervisor, beware of the applicant's statement of disability, building a credible disability retirement application, civil service disability, consistency in the whole federal disability retirement package, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement for federal employees, federal disability and the agency's certification of accommodation, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, federal employee disability, fers disability application supervisor comments, fers disability blog, getting a solid foundation from which to build your fers disability case, importance of the narrative report on opm disability, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal representation for injured federal workers, nationwide representation of federal employees, one coherent federal disability retirement application, OPM disability application tips and strategies, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement consistency, OPM Reconsideration Stage, owcp disability retirement, Postal Service disability, pragmatic methodology, preparing a federal disability retirement application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, Second Step OPM Appeal, the applicant's control of the opm disability application and process, the limited power of a supervisor in the fers disability retirement process, the most important form in the federal disability retirement package: sf 3112a, USPS disability retirement benefits, why all the forms and documents of your fers disability claim must be logically connected, why the applicant's statements is such an important document in a fers disability claim, your supervisor and federal disability retirement | Leave a comment »