Ultimately, Federal Disability Retirement is based upon the persuasive delineation of three primary elements: A medical condition; impact of the medical condition upon one or more of the essential elements of one’s job; and an inability on the part of the agency to accommodate the resulting impact of the medical condition upon one’s inability to perform all of the essential elements of one’s job.
How one proceeds to “prove” the case; what “kind” of evidence one needs to provide; the qualitative nature of the proof to be submitted; the quantity and volume of the type of evidentiary submissions to be included; these are determined by necessity based upon the nature of the medical condition itself.
Thus, some medical conditions may require merely a few pages; others, extensive supporting documentation, including treatment notes, diagnostic test results, explanatory clinical encounters and narratives which show a history of treatment-resistant modalities of medical applications as well as fulfillment of such extensive attempts which validate that the patient/applicant is not a “malingerer”, but rather exhibits symptoms which defy traditional approaches both for diagnoses and treatment.
It is always upon the first of the three elements identified which forms the foundational basis of a Federal Disability Retirement application; the sequential nexus of the two following almost creates itself, like the phoenix arising from the ashes, only in this case, from the debilitating medical condition from which one suffers.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a good measure of credible proof to show you are disabled under fers/csrs laws, a process that requires proof and documentation, a strong and solid foundation for your fers disability retirement case: high quality and a relative quantity of medical evidence, documentation for federal medical retirement, documentation proof during the federal disability retirement process, federal disability retirement is all about improving your health by not doing a job that will further hurt you, how to file a successful federal opm disability claim, how to win an opm disability retirement claim, insufficient medical documentation for OPM disability, large amount of medical documentation for opm disability retirement, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, meeting the basic requirements or actually proving my fers disability claim, objective language and evidence in the opm disability claim, objective medical evidence for federal disability cases, opm disability -- it's all about proving you are too disabled for your federal job, opm disability retirement is a proof-based process, opm disability retirement: a paradigm of hope and a second chance, paradigms and eligibility criteria for retirement from us government, place quality over quantity, relevance over quantity in opm medical retirement paperwork, strong and irrefutable medical evidence, supporting substantial medical evidence to OPM, the nature of your medical conditions determines the quality and quantity of the medical documentation needed to win a case, the necessity of proving preponderance of evidence to win a fers disability claim, the responsibility of proving your fers disability claim, tips for proving your federal disability retirement eligibility | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Focusing upon the Bridge
In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, the multitude of aspects in preparing the application will often lend itself to detracting and distracting from the primary elements of an effective application and presentation.
Thus, worries about what the Supervisor will or will not say; whether the Agency will mis-characterize a supposed “good deed” they performed by declaring it to be an “accommodation”, with the danger that such declaration and characterization will be accepted by the Clerk at the Office of Personnel Management as true, etc. — all of these take away from the essence of creating that important bridge between one’s medical conditions and the essential elements of one’s positional duties.
Because the vast majority of denials issued by the Office of Personnel Management are based upon “insufficient medical documentation”, an undue focus upon other elements of a Federal Disability Retirement application would not be an intelligent utilization of one’s time and effort.
While OPM will certainly argue that the Agency has “accommodated” the Federal or Postal employee (and use that term improperly 9 times out of 10); and while OPM will point to elements in a Supervisor’s Statement as a further basis for a denial; each such supplemental argument by the Office of Personnel Management is nevertheless based upon the centrality of a primary argument, in most cases: Insufficient Medical Documentation.
As such, it is prudent to focus one’s efforts upon the primary basis which provides the foundation for an effective Federal Disability Retirement application: The bridge between one’s medical conditions, and the essential elements of one’s job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accommodation issues in FERS disability retirement, all conditions listed in the application should explain the "nexus", attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability retirement, insufficient medical documentation for OPM disability, neutralizing negative statements from supervisor's statements in sf 3112b, Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements, nexus between medical disability and job performance, OPM disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, primary elements of an effective fers disability application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, starting with generic information about the nexus, the ''insufficient medical documentation'' argument, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the federal disability bridge, USPS disability retirement, what is really important is the nexus of medical condition and job performance | Leave a comment »