Filing an application for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, either by a Postal employee or a non-Postal, Federal employee, is an administrative process which “requests” that a certain benefit be paid by the Federal Government. In order to be approved, one must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that one has met the eligibility criteria that has been set forth through statute, regulation, and cases which have interpreted those statutes and regulations over the years. Thus, like any other area of law, there is a large pool of legal issues which have arisen over the years. Because of this, it is important to understand that a certain amount of argumentation, persuasion, and logical analysis and delineation must occur. Many people are surprised when, after submitting the “paperwork” and attaching some medical documents to the application, that the Office of Personnel Management would deny the applicant’s submission, saying with surprise, “I thought it would be easy”. In any area of law, administrative or otherwise, where the pool of issues has grown over many decades, there must be a level of argument, persuasion and logic which must be engaged. The legal arena for being approved in a Federal Disability Retirement case for those under FERS or CSRS is no different.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof, Eligibility Criteria, Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a logically structured federal employee disability application, application of case laws on federal disability retirement claims, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, case law citation in federal disabilities cases, civil service disability, consistency of argumentation principles key to success, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, federal disability attorney, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability law blog, FERS disability retirement, fers litigation and case laws on disability benefits, FERS medical retirement, interpretation of court decisions about opm disability, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal & foundational argument, legal analysis of opm disability rulings, legal arguments in the federal disability application, legal persuasion in the initial federal disability application, legal representation for injured federal workers, logical argumentation in federal disability retirement, OPM disability application tips and strategies, OPM disability attorney, OPM disability lawyer, opm legal principles embodied in judicial decisions, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor, Post Office disability, Postal disability retirement, process argumentation and the substance of the opm disability case law, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, statutory legal standard of disability or impairment, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the applicant's legal arguments, the opm representative's first-level decision-making process, the relevance of applying opm disability case laws to your own claim, the theory and practice of opm disability statutory interpretation, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, writing a persuasive legal analysis of your case, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »