For Federal and Postal employees filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, the issue of accommodation must be addressed at some point, and one often wonders why a Federal agency is either unwilling or unable to accommodate the medical disabilities of a Federal or Postal employee.
The line between “unwilling” and “unable” is often a complex one, because Agencies must contend with an obligation to attempt to accommodate the medical disability, but remember that such an attempt and obligation is merely one of “reasonable” accommodation. This means that an implicit cost-benefits analysis is quickly engaged in, where the effort, likely success, extent of any workplace adjustments, whether in the end the essential and core elements of the job functions can be accomplished even with the reasonable accommodations, etc., can successfully be implemented.
An appearance of attempting to accommodate is often all that is indulged, and so the reality is that the Agency seems more unwilling than unable. Further, the simple fact is that, many medical conditions — e.g., those which are psychiatric in nature, are simply medical conditions which are termed “non-accommodatable“. For, regardless of what workplace adjustments are made, a Federal or Postal worker suffering from Major Depression, anxiety, panic attacks, delusory thought processes, etc., where symptoms upon one’s focus, concentration, ability to have a reasoned perspective, etc., are all impacted, and therefore is inconsistent with any cognitive-intensive work. As such, the medical condition becomes “inconsistent” with the particular duties of the job, and therefore it is an unreasonable and unattainable goal to consider any accommodations.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, accommodating mental psychiatric conditions, accommodation issues in FERS disability retirement, civil service disability, disability retirement at the USPS, failing to provide limited duty to injured workers, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, federal disability law firm, federal disability law firms in the washington area, federal employees with psychiatric disabilities and cognitive-intensive jobs, federal workmans comp limited duty capacity, FERS disability lawyer, FERS medical retirement, inability or unwillingness to accommodate disabled federal employees, incentives to light duty employees to remain productive, ineffective accommodation in the federal workplace, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, law firm serving disabled federal workers, legal accommodation under ada but not for opm disability retirement, light duty and reasonable accommodation, light duty federal employees and the social security, light duty in the Postal Service, limited jobs for light duty employees, no light or limited duty for a severe non-work related disability, OPM disability application tips and strategies, owcp accommodations, owcp disability retirement, post employee benefits for federal workers currently on ''light duty'', reasonable accommodation of federal workers, representing federal employees from any us government agency, some mental disabilities just can't just be accommodated in governement jobs, usps accommodation, USPS disability retirement, usps limited duty jobs, usps management reasonable accommodation, what to do when federal agency does not accommodate, when ada and rehab acts might not be enough for the injured federal worker, when excessing light duty from usps then consider disability, when federal agencies refuse or are unable to accommodate, when the federal government doesn't accommodate you, when the usps refuses accommodation of employee | Leave a comment »