Is it better to live life ready to confront every trouble encountered, realized or yet in a state of potentiality? Or, is it wiser to avoid troubles entirely — you know, that person who, at the first sign of trouble, slinks off into the void of anonymity never to be seen or heard from again, until the trouble is solved or resolves itself?
Or, is “discretion the better part of valor”, as a proverb would see it — where, judgment in tackling certain kinds of trouble, while avoiding others, is what constitutes “wisdom”?
In a Federal Disability Retirement case, there are multiple problems and issues to resolve involving the Agency or the Postal Service; of the “proof” necessary to meet the eligibility criteria; of agency actions which may or may not impact one’s Federal Disability Retirement application and the persuasive evidence needed to confront OPM in the event of a denial from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Contact an OPM Disability Lawyer who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law, and consider how important it is to retain counsel who will see you through the bureaucratic morass which a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS must undergo, and always involving what troubles to confront, and what troubles to avoid — and how.
Robert R. McGill
Lawyer exclusively representing Federal and Postal employees to secure their Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.