Responding to an OPM Disability Retirement application denial is fraught with dangers of addressing the right issue; whether such a response does so adequately; and the determination of the extent of what constitutes “adequacy” in such a response. Properly reading the “road signs” is the key to a successful response. For, to begin with, cogency and brevity are not characteristics which are common in an OPM Disability Retirement denial.
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management utilizes multiple templates in referring to the sufficiency of legal and documentary proof, and will often shift arbitrarily in declaring why, and to what extent, a Federal or Postal disability retirement application did not meet the standard of proof required, which is governed by a “preponderance of the evidence”. They will, of course, often cite various legal “criteria”, and number them accordingly, as in: “You did not meet Criteria Number 4 in that…”
In responding, it is important to address the critical issues which OPM regards as central to its decision, and as all roads lead back to Rome, so it is with a response to a denial from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in a Federal Disability Retirement case: All roads lead back to the original nexus of whether a Federal or Postal employee can perform all of the essential elements of one’s job within the context of the severity and extent of one’s medical conditions, and to the issue of whether or not a “reasonable” accommodation could have been provided by the individual’s agency.
Broken down into its foundational components, the pathways can be ultimately discerned, and the proverbial fork-in-the-road leading one to the right way back to Rome will often depend upon how the traveler interprets the signs.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: all signs of application deficiency usually lead to the two same basic federal disability concepts, appeal to first OPM denial decision, applying for federal disability, careful walking in the path toward federal disability retirement, civil service disability retirement, denial of fers disability benefits and the proper response, disability retirement at the USPS, essential elements of jobs, examining the opm denial letter to figure out substantive issues with the original application, federal employee disability, filing for OPM disability retirement, going back to the basics after your fers disability retirement application is denied, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, looking for clues in the opm disability denial letter to find out the substantive issues, opm denial letter templates and the essence of the denial, OPM disability application tips and strategies, opm road signs that lead toward the nexus, Postal disability retirement, Postal Service disability, proper response to the agency, responding to a denial of fers disability benefits with the basic statutory requirements in mind, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the limited power of the opm to justify denials, the nexus and the accommodation issues must be emphasized during the fers disability reconsideration stage, the nexus and the other less difficult issue that must be nevertheless addressed: accommodations, the original federal disability retirement application, the path toward financial independence for a disabled federal employee, the signs of a denial letter always point back to the basics: the nexus concept, usps denial federal compensation attorney, when all your medical and health issues point toward federal disability retirement | Leave a comment »
