The historical context of one’s medical condition is an issue which is mostly irrelevant for the First and Second Stages of a Federal Disability Retirement application, submitted to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS. This is because OPM is not interested — or, more accurately, the law does not recognize as relevant in analyzing the eligibility criteria applied in a Federal Disability Retirement application — of “how” or “why”.
While such contextual information may be relevant for OWCP/FECA cases because of the issue of causality and its importance in such cases, the overriding and determining factor in a Federal Disability Retirement application is whether a Federal or Postal employee has a medical condition; how that medical condition prevents one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job; and whether the medical condition will last a minimum of 12 months.
Outside of that contextual information (actually, such information is more accurately identified as content-information), OPM in pragmatic terms has no patience for the historical background of such information. Obviously, however, some contextual narrative should be included in any Applicant’s Statement of Disability, in order to make the statement meaningful.
One last point: While historical context may not be relevant for the Initial Stage and the Reconsideration Stage, it may be very important if one finds oneself before an Administrative Judge at the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: attorney representing federal employees, casualty and causation issues usually during the federal disability retirement process, casualty disability retirement and situational disability concepts, civil service disability, compensation benefits for federal employees with no work-related injuries, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement for federal employees and work-related issues, federal employee disability, federal employee long term job related injury claim, federal employees long-term compensation non job related, Federal employees' work-related injury or disease compensation, federal workers benefits for a non work-related injury, FERS disability retirement, historical substantive narration in the opm applicant's statements, irrelevant causation questions and the federal disability retirement application forms, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical compensation and benefits available for federal workers, medical compensation for federal and postal workers, medical history and federal disability retirement, nationwide representation of federal employees, notes on illness causation and situation disability for federal employees, OPM disability doesn't have to be job-related, owcp disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, the "why" and "how" the federal employee became injured, the history of a medical condition in the proper context of the applicant's statement of disability, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, USPS disability retirement, when causation is an issue in opm disability law, why causation in not usually an issue in opm disability retirement, work-place accident in a federal or Postal job | Leave a comment »