Over time, one’s memory and historical perspective becomes clouded and obscured. In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there is obviously a long and complex history of changes, amendments and refinements to the aggregate compendium of that which constitutes the totality of “the law” governing Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
Thus, since the initial inception of the enactment of statutory authority granting the U.S. Office of Personnel Management authority to approve Federal Disability Retirement benefits under CSRS (and later under FERS), there has been an evolution of statutory amendments, regulatory clarifications, case-law expansion, contraction and clarifications — the composite of which constitutes “the law” governing Federal Disability Retirement applications whether under FERS or CSRS.
Part of the evolutionary process includes what is termed “supportive” documentation or evidence, such as an Agency’s determination that the Federal or Postal employee cannot be accommodated; the Flight Surgeon’s decertification of an Air Traffic Controller’s medical clearance; a Law Enforcement agency’s conclusions that a Federal Law Enforcement Officer is unable to meet the physical requirements of his or her position; and many other agency determinations which “support” a Federal Disability Retirement application. But “supportive” does not mean “primary”, and the Federal or Postal worker must always remember that such ancillary evidence must be in addition to the primary evidence submitted in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Don’t mistake the support evidence as replacing the essential evidentiary component of a Federal Disability Retirement application, whether under FERS or CSRS. The primary evidence must always come first — both by definition, as well as by statutory requirement.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, additional evidence to sustain your fers disability claim, civil service disability retirement, CSRS disability attorney, evidence needed to get my fers disability application approved, evolution of statutory amendments in fers disability law, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, help in collecting medical evidence and putting package together, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyer federal retirement disability, medical disability retirement fers blog, Medical Documentation for OPM Disability Retirement, medical evidence, OPM disability retirement, physical requirements federal law enforcement and disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, preponderance of the evidence documents, representing federal employees from any us government agency, statutory legal standard of disability or impairment, strong and irrefutable medical evidence, support evidence v. essential evidentiary in the opm application packet, supporting substantial medical evidence to OPM, types of evidence used to prove a federal employee disability case, using agency determinations as evidence for your fers disability claim, what medical evidence is needed for an opm claim?, what supportive documentation or evidence really means under opm disability law | 1 Comment »