In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, make sure that the medical condition which the Federal or Postal employee is listing, describing and delineating, including the symptoms and impact, etc., is “relevant” to one’s Federal Disability Retirement application under either FERS or CSRS.
Let me clarify with the following (outlandish) hypothetical: A Federal employee has the job and positional duty of pushing a button with his right index finger once every 2 hours. He suffers a horrendous injury to his left shoulder, left arm, left leg and left side of his body. Use of the left side of his body is nowhere described or required in his position description, and the Agency has never requested that he use the left arm, shoulder or leg, or any part of the left side of his body, in performing the essential elements of his job. He prepares and formulates his Federal Disability Retirement application, describing the extent of his medical limitation of the left side of his body. Result: he is denied by the Office of Personnel Management because the relevance of his medical condition has not been established with respect to the essential elements of his job.
“Relevance” of a medical condition is essential to establish in a Federal Disability Retirement application. Now, had the Federal or Postal worker gone on to describe how the chronic and radiating pain from the left-sided injuries (taking the hypothetical one step further) impacted his ability to use his right index finger, and this was established through the medical opinion of his treating doctor, the case would have had merit and a basis for an appeal, argumentation, etc., would have been established.
But in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, it is important to understand and apply the basic principle in the Federal Disability Retirement case: It is not just the medical condition which is at issue; it must encompass the relevance of the medical condition to the essential elements of one’s job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: an essential element in preparing your disability claim with the opm, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, choosing the relevant medical condition to list in your opm disability claim, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, deciding what medical documentation is relevant to your opm claim, essential elements of job not found in official job description, essential elements of jobs, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, getting relevant medical documentation key in securing opm disability, how to list all relevant medical conditions in the opm disability claim, nationwide representation of federal employees, obvious essential elements of the job not so obvious sometimes, only relevant narrative and medical information in the standard form 3112, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, stating the facts about the essential element of the job, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the medical condition and the essential elements of job connection, USPS disability retirement | Leave a comment »