Stress is a natural and inherent part of everyday and ordinary life.
For the Federal and Postal employee who is considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, one needs to always consider its form, content, extent and significance of inclusion in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
As a primary diagnosis, such an inclusion can be considered as merely “situational“, precisely because stress is a factor seen in workplace contexts across the board. As a secondary manifestation of another primary diagnoses, the danger of having the condition relegated to being a situational condition immediately disappears.
Whether the conceptual construct is used as a noun or as a working verb may appear to be merely a linguistically elastic play — a Wittgensteinian language game of sorts — but it is precisely what must be engaged in for a successful preparation and formulation of a Federal Disability Retirement application.
For, in the end, a Federal Disability Retirement application is a paper presentation to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, encompassing a wide spectrum of descriptions, arguments and factual/legal analysis; and such is the nature of a language game, where the conversion of nouns into working verbs may be the difference between success or failure in a Federal OPM Disability Retirement claim.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Specific Medical Conditions, U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Disability Retirement | Tagged: a hostile work environment in the federal government can create stress and other mental issues, are stress and anxiety hard to prove in an owcp work related claim?, attorney that will handle opm disability cases for stress, benefits of an annuity opm, choosing the right words in what is really a paper presentation in the eyes of the opm representative, conveying an articulate message to the opm, csrs and fers disability law and language, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing your disability argument in plain english, disability retirement under opm medical retirement law and effective communication, disabling conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, effective message repetition in the opm disability retirement application, federal disability retirement law and language used in the application, federal employees with high levels of stress and depression, federal employees with stress and heart attacks, federal government disability benefits, federal long term incapacity, fers and sick leave, fers early retirement, FERS medical retirement, fers medical retirement for stress, fers pension, fers retirement sick leave, focusing on the use of clear language in the opm disability retirement claim, good and precise communication as a key component to the success of your fers disability retirement claim, gov retirement health related issues, health life opm annuity benefits, how to file an effective federal disability retirement application, language and human condition in the 3112, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical benefits of fed system, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, OPM disability retirement, opm health retirement health, owcp disability retirement, owcp stress claims, owcp.gov retirement, plan benefits owcp or opm compare, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, post office federal opm medical retirement, Postal disability retirement, preparing an effective medical narrative report for an opm disability application, primary elements of an effective fers disability application, reorganizing your federal disability retirement application documents, repeating the same mantra: the focus is on the nexus, representing federal employees from any us government agency, retire med fers, sick leave fers credit, speaking the federal disability retirement language, telling the human side of the story behind the federal disability application, telling the medical story in the applicant's statement of disability, the proper word-choice communication language used in a fers med claim in a paperless world, the use of language in the fers disability application, trying to use a clear and concise language in your fers disability retirement application, united states civil service med annuity, using an effective written communication strategy in your fers disability application, using plain english to explain your opm medical claim, USPS disability retirement, writing an effective opm application memoranda, writing communication skills in the opm disability retirement application | Leave a comment »
Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Responding to Stupidity
Sometimes, one’s initial reaction in a situation — professional setting, social discourse, event gathering, etc. — requires a momentary pause; and it is precisely that couple of seconds of gathering one’s thoughts which saves one from further putting fuel upon a potential fire.
Perhaps you have every right to have responded with a drip of sarcasm; or others would have approved of the lashing back; and still others would say that the response was appropriate and deservedly given. But the greater question should always be: how effective was the response; did it evoke the necessary end; and for whose benefit was the aggressive retort given — for the benefit of truth, or for one’s own satisfaction?
In a professional context, of course, it is probably never appropriate to respond in an unprofessional way, if merely by definition alone. Similarly, in a FERS or CSRS Federal Disability Retirement context, when one receives a denial from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there are statements made — whether one pertaining to mis-application or mis-statement of the law; or perhaps a wrong reference to a medical report; or even more egregious, a selective use of a statement from a medical report or record taken out of context — which can deservedly provoke a response involving sarcasm, a deluge of epithets, or worse, a barrage of ad hominem attacks — and in each case, it would be neither appropriately given, nor proper in a professional sense.
Fortunately, paper presentations and paper responses have the advantage of time over social discourse and person-to-person contact.
Holding one’s breath and counting 3 seconds, or 10, or perhaps an eternity, is an effective way of avoiding catastrophe. Writing a diatribe of what one wants to say, then trashing it, is also acceptable. On the other hand, beware of that “send” button; and, moreover, never push that “send to all” button.
That would indeed be unprofessional.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage, When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: a rational response to an unreasonable letter of denial opm benefits, an effective federal disability retirement application, an effective written communication to the opm, an individualized response to your fers disability denial, an understandable emotional response to an irrational fers disability decision, applying old-fashioned ethical principles in the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, denial of fers disability benefits and the proper response, effective personal skills when dealing with supervisors, emotional comments won't always help to get opm application approved, federal disability attorney, fers disability retirement and effective communication, how to respond to a federal disability retirement denial, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal effectiveness in government disability claims, legal help after first application denial, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, reflecting on emotional tone from the legal angle, refrain from fast and emotional responses when opm denies your disability claim, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, Responding to an Initial Federal Disability Retirement Denial of Benefits, response to denial of opm disability retirement benefits, Second Step OPM Appeal, the 2nd fers disability stage is still an administrative process with the opm, the date of the denial letter and responding to a denial of opm disability benefits, the dreaded denial letter, the effective way of presenting one's opm disability case, the federal disability retirement application with an emotional tone deep inside in the objective medical language used, the opm case worker at the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, the role of the applicant during the second stage, the second stage opm representative, using some emotional content in your fers disability application, USPS disability retirement, we may be talking about emotional issues or medical documentation -- but never forget the nexus | Leave a comment »