As with most bureaucracies, the Office of Personnel Management is first and foremost established and guided by statutory mandate. However, there is a distinction to be made between the establishment of a particular agency, and the mission and substantive enforcement of the mission as mandated by statute.
Often, in its very decision-making process of reviewing, evaluating and deciding upon a Federal Disability Retirement application (whether under FERS or CSRS), it is important to recognize that if a decision is made erroneously, it does not imply or infer a statutory violation. The statute is open to various interpretations, and such openness lends itself to a wide array of discretionary decision-making. Complaining or fuming about whether or not OPM violated its statutory mandate is an act of futility; the process itself provides for a paradigm of “checks and balances” — of having the Merit Systems Protection Board and an Administrative Judge look at a case and hold a Hearing on a case “de novo” — meaning, “anew” or “starting fresh”.
Further, if one believes that the MSPB Hearing and Administrative Judge rendered a wrong decision, there is the further step in the process of a Petition for Full Review, or an appeal to the Federal Circuit Court for review of any error of law made in the decision-making process. However, the best course of action if one is still before the Office of Personnel Management, or about to present one’s case at the Hearing Stage of the MSPB, is to focus upon the substance of one’s case, and not upon whether or not OPM or anyone else violated its statutory mandate.
Save your energy and choose your battles; moreover, it is important to keep a singular focus upon the proper goal — of obtaining one’s Federal Disability Retirement annuity.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: attacking the opm or attacking opm's decision to deny your disability retirement claim, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, careful planning from beginning can save you future substantial time, choosing your battles from the beginning of the fers disability process, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, essential elements of jobs, federal disability law blog, knowing your priorities and strategies on a fers disability claim, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, mandate and mission of the office of personnel management, mission of the opm and disability processing claims, mspb attorneys, OPM disability appeal to the MSPB, OPM disability retirement, opm lawyers, opm's statutory authority over federal disability claims, postal service disability retirement, pragmatic methodology, resources for injured federal workers, second stage opm disability retirement process, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the scrutiny of the administrative law judge, the substance of your disability retirement claim, the theory and practice of opm disability statutory interpretation, thinking process, USPS disability retirement, when the opm interpretes disability statutes in its own way, your opm attorney's discretionary decision making | Leave a comment »