Periodically, despite multiple prior blogs addressing certain issues, it becomes clear that confusions continue to abound, and a clarification is in order.
In many ways, such necessity for periodic clarifications only emphasizes the inherent complexities in Federal Disability Retirement law, despite the foundational simplicity of what needs to be proven.
Indeed, while the substantive law requires the primary basis of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, the nexus between one’s official positional duties, and the medical conditions which prevent one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job; nevertheless, there are numerous procedural issues and hurdles which must concurrently be met in order to qualify for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
Thus, for instance: the Federal or Postal employee must file an application for Federal Disability Retirement benefits within one (1) year of being separated from Federal Service — not 1 year from the date of being placed on LWOP, or from the “date of injury”, etc.
Further, SSDI must be filed by FERS employees, but of course Social Security will not even consider a filing for purposes of evaluating eligibility until a person has stopped working — nevertheless, for FERS Disability Retirement purposes, all that is necessary is a receipt showing that one has filed for Social Security Disability benefits.
And one more: never wait for one’s agency to act in a Disability Retirement case; such waiting merely constitutes an act of futility, and one which almost always results with an adverse effect upon the Federal or Postal employee.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, are fers disability retirement applicants required to file for ssdi too?, attorney representing federal employees, betting that the usps will take favorable actions that will help you to prove disability, clarificaciones importantes sobre retiro medico para empleados federales, clarifications on some confusing federal disability retirement issues, complex, confusion about key concepts in fers disability retirement benefits, Federal Disability, federal disability attorney's advice, federal disability retirement, fers disability and social security disability insurance ssdi, FERS disability retirement, important issues that federal disability retirement applicants should consider steadly, issues that need to be clarified about the federal disability retirement application and process, lawyer federal retirement disability, legal representation for injured federal workers, making a pragmatic consideration on disability issues, one year limitation federal disability retirement, one year separated from service opm rule, opm disability law and the preponderance of evidence concept, OPM disability retirement, opm disability tips for non lawyers, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, postal service disability retirement blog, postal workers owcp rights attorney, preponderance of the evidence concept in fers disability law, recommendations and tips for the opm disability application, some issues that need to be understood prior to federal disability filing, the complexity of the fers disability process, the intrinsic complexities of the federal disability retirement process, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, tips on filing for federal employees disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, waiting for the agency to take favorable actions | Leave a comment »