Stress is a natural and inherent part of everyday and ordinary life.
For the Federal and Postal employee who is considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, one needs to always consider its form, content, extent and significance of inclusion in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
As a primary diagnosis, such an inclusion can be considered as merely “situational“, precisely because stress is a factor seen in workplace contexts across the board. As a secondary manifestation of another primary diagnoses, the danger of having the condition relegated to being a situational condition immediately disappears.
Whether the conceptual construct is used as a noun or as a working verb may appear to be merely a linguistically elastic play — a Wittgensteinian language game of sorts — but it is precisely what must be engaged in for a successful preparation and formulation of a Federal Disability Retirement application.
For, in the end, a Federal Disability Retirement application is a paper presentation to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, encompassing a wide spectrum of descriptions, arguments and factual/legal analysis; and such is the nature of a language game, where the conversion of nouns into working verbs may be the difference between success or failure in a Federal OPM Disability Retirement claim.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Specific Medical Conditions, U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Disability Retirement | Tagged: a hostile work environment in the federal government can create stress and other mental issues, are stress and anxiety hard to prove in an owcp work related claim?, attorney that will handle opm disability cases for stress, benefits of an annuity opm, choosing the right words in what is really a paper presentation in the eyes of the opm representative, conveying an articulate message to the opm, csrs and fers disability law and language, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing your disability argument in plain english, disability retirement under opm medical retirement law and effective communication, disabling conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, effective message repetition in the opm disability retirement application, federal disability retirement law and language used in the application, federal employees with high levels of stress and depression, federal employees with stress and heart attacks, federal government disability benefits, federal long term incapacity, fers and sick leave, fers early retirement, FERS medical retirement, fers medical retirement for stress, fers pension, fers retirement sick leave, focusing on the use of clear language in the opm disability retirement claim, good and precise communication as a key component to the success of your fers disability retirement claim, gov retirement health related issues, health life opm annuity benefits, how to file an effective federal disability retirement application, language and human condition in the 3112, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical benefits of fed system, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, OPM disability retirement, opm health retirement health, owcp disability retirement, owcp stress claims, owcp.gov retirement, plan benefits owcp or opm compare, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, post office federal opm medical retirement, Postal disability retirement, preparing an effective medical narrative report for an opm disability application, primary elements of an effective fers disability application, reorganizing your federal disability retirement application documents, repeating the same mantra: the focus is on the nexus, representing federal employees from any us government agency, retire med fers, sick leave fers credit, speaking the federal disability retirement language, telling the human side of the story behind the federal disability application, telling the medical story in the applicant's statement of disability, the proper word-choice communication language used in a fers med claim in a paperless world, the use of language in the fers disability application, trying to use a clear and concise language in your fers disability retirement application, united states civil service med annuity, using an effective written communication strategy in your fers disability application, using plain english to explain your opm medical claim, USPS disability retirement, writing an effective opm application memoranda, writing communication skills in the opm disability retirement application | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Focusing upon the Bridge
In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, the multitude of aspects in preparing the application will often lend itself to detracting and distracting from the primary elements of an effective application and presentation.
Thus, worries about what the Supervisor will or will not say; whether the Agency will mis-characterize a supposed “good deed” they performed by declaring it to be an “accommodation”, with the danger that such declaration and characterization will be accepted by the Clerk at the Office of Personnel Management as true, etc. — all of these take away from the essence of creating that important bridge between one’s medical conditions and the essential elements of one’s positional duties.
Because the vast majority of denials issued by the Office of Personnel Management are based upon “insufficient medical documentation”, an undue focus upon other elements of a Federal Disability Retirement application would not be an intelligent utilization of one’s time and effort.
While OPM will certainly argue that the Agency has “accommodated” the Federal or Postal employee (and use that term improperly 9 times out of 10); and while OPM will point to elements in a Supervisor’s Statement as a further basis for a denial; each such supplemental argument by the Office of Personnel Management is nevertheless based upon the centrality of a primary argument, in most cases: Insufficient Medical Documentation.
As such, it is prudent to focus one’s efforts upon the primary basis which provides the foundation for an effective Federal Disability Retirement application: The bridge between one’s medical conditions, and the essential elements of one’s job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accommodation issues in FERS disability retirement, all conditions listed in the application should explain the "nexus", attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability retirement, insufficient medical documentation for OPM disability, neutralizing negative statements from supervisor's statements in sf 3112b, Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements, nexus between medical disability and job performance, OPM disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, primary elements of an effective fers disability application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, starting with generic information about the nexus, the ''insufficient medical documentation'' argument, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the federal disability bridge, USPS disability retirement, what is really important is the nexus of medical condition and job performance | Leave a comment »