A declaration of the sheer volume of medical evidence submitted is often an indicator of the basis for which a Federal Disability Retirement application was formulated; for, in the end, if reliance of the successful outcome of a Federal Disability Retirement application is expected based upon the longevity and extent of a medical condition, the chances of an initial approval may be somewhat compromised to begin with.
Volume can never replace content; and from the perspective of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there is often an underlying suspicion that receipt of a thousand pages of medical documentation indicates merely that volume of treatment is being substituted for the substantive content of meeting the required legal standards.
Much of medical notation and treatment records merely reflect a particular appointment’s mechanical applications — continuation of previous treatment plan; refill of prescriptions; standard positive or negative responses to particular questions; prospective treatment modalities; and, as supportive evidence attached to a substantive medical report, they can reinforce the satisfaction of the legal criteria of establishing the necessary nexus between one’s medical condition and the inability to perform the essential elements of one’s job. But left as a replacement for the doctor’s explicit statement confirming such a nexus, it remains a hollow voice within an expansive but empty chamber.
One should never mistake the legal distinction between “primary” evidence and “supportive” evidence. The former is meant to establish the nexus between one’s medical condition and the essential elements of one’s job; the latter is submitted to reinforce the former. When one utilizes the former as the substitute for the latter, it is like the self-delusion that just because you are the best player on a pick-up team in your neighborhood, you are ready to enter into the world of professional sports.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM | Tagged: a good measure of credible proof to show you are disabled under fers/csrs laws, a process that requires proof and documentation, a strong and solid foundation for your fers disability retirement case: high quality and a relative quantity of medical evidence, accurate and proper medical documentation key for getting fers disability, advice on the opm disability retirement paperwork and process, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, being careful with the medical documentation you submit to opm, building a strong opm claim doesn't take lots of medical documents, can you add medical documentation after originally submitting opm disability claim?, compiling medical evidence to support opm disability application, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, deciding what medical documentation is relevant to your opm claim, determining whether you have enough medical evidence for an opm claim, disability paperwork usps, do I have the appropriate medical documentation to support my fers disability retirement application?, documentation proof during the federal disability retirement process, emphasizing quality in submitting opm medical records, evidence needed to get my fers disability application approved, FERS disability retirement, finding persuasive evidence to approve your fers disability application, gathering medical documentation for an incapacitated federal employee, getting quality and substantial medical documentation, getting relevant medical documentation key in securing opm disability, getting the right forms and medical evidence for your federal disability application, giving only quality information in your fers disability retirement, handling your fers disability application paperwork to your agency, how much medical documentation opm disability retirement, insights to the opm proof-process, keeping track of all disability retirement paperwork submitted to opm, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, medical evidence a federal worker will need to retire for ptsd, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability application paperwork flow, opm disability legal sufficiency and proof, OPM disability retirement, place quality over quantity, postal service disability retirement, proof of disability for federal workers, proof of eligibility in federal postal disability, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, quantity and quality of information in the internet about the fdr process, relevance over quantity in opm medical retirement paperwork, representing federal employees from any us government agency, submitting a balanced and credible medical documentation to the opm, the nature of your medical conditions determines the quality and quantity of the medical documentation needed to win a case, the opm must evaluate medical documentation, time for the doctor to prepare a proper opm medical documentation, USPS disability retirement, usps medical documentation requirements, what kind of paperwork do I need to show I need to medically retire from the government, what medical documents to use in an opm disability application, what medical evidence is needed for an opm claim?, what other medical documentation to use in fers disability retirement, when the opm argues that your medical documentation is not good enough, your weakest medical documentation is the one that the opm may use to deny fers disability benefits | Leave a comment »