• Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Credentials

OPM Disability Retirement

Entries RSS | Comments RSS
  • Pages

    • About Me
    • Contact Us
    • Copyright
    • Credentials
  • Categories

    • Accommodation and Light Duty (40)
    • Advantages of Federal Disability Retirement (27)
    • Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions (44)
    • Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM (43)
    • Burden of Proof (30)
    • Clarifications of Laws or Rules (160)
    • CSRS Disability (1)
    • Eligibility Criteria (18)
    • Evaluation Of Your OPM Disability Claim – How Do I Know If I Have A Strong Case? (17)
    • Fables, Stories and Analogies about CSRS and FERS Medical Retirement Benefits (64)
    • Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted (35)
    • FERS Disability (10)
    • Important Cases, Legal Updates and/or the Current Process Waiting Time (49)
    • Life after Federal Disability Retirement (21)
    • LWOP and Sick Leave in OPM Disability (12)
    • Mental/Nervous Condition (47)
    • Miscellaneous (179)
    • OPM Disability & OWCP Workers Comp Filings (44)
    • OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits (39)
    • OPM Disability & VA Benefits (4)
    • OPM Disability Actors (286)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Agency (54)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Applicant (77)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Attorney (55)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Doctor (53)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Human Resources Office (17)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The MSPB Administrative Judge (6)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The OPM Representatives (31)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Others (9)
      • OPM Disability Actors – The Supervisor (13)
    • OPM Disability Administrative Law (Statutory and Non-Statutory Law) (13)
    • OPM Disability and a Hostile Working Environment (11)
    • OPM Disability Application (185)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package (28)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS (62)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS (9)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112C Physician's Statement for CSRS and FERS (15)
      • OPM Disability Application – SF 3112D Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for CSRS and FERS (7)
    • OPM Disability Process (158)
      • OPM Disability Process – 1st Stage: OPM Disability Application (35)
      • OPM Disability Process – 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage (28)
      • OPM Disability Process – 3rd Stage: MSPB Stage (17)
      • OPM Disability Process – 4th Stage: Petition for Full Review at the MSPB (4)
      • OPM Disability Process – 5th Stage: Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (2)
    • OPM Disability Retirement & EEOC Complaints (4)
    • OPM Medical Questionnaire (8)
    • Post-Application Issues (18)
    • Pre-Application Considerations (425)
    • Professional & Expert Witnesses (5)
    • Reasonable Medical Treatment and Compliance Issues (6)
    • Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer (1,702)
    • Resigning or Being Separated From a Federal Agency for Medical Problems or Other Reasons (34)
    • SF 3112 Forms (10)
    • Specific Medical Conditions (28)
    • The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney (79)
    • Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application (202)
    • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) (21)
    • U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (76)
    • U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Disability Retirement (36)
    • Uncategorized (377)
    • When the OPM Application Is Approved (13)
    • When the OPM Application Is Denied (88)
  • Past Blogs

  • Top Posts

    • OPM Disability Retirement for Federal & Postal Employees: The Fade of Memories
    • FERS/SSDI Offsets: Major Precedent-setting Case
    • Attorney for Federal Disability Retirement claims: The tumultuous years
    • Disability Retirement for Federal Workers: Working while Waiting
    • OPM Disability Retirement under FERS: The Value of Advice
    • Federal Employee Medical Retirement: The Human Narrative
    • Attorney Representation OPM Disability Retirement: The dreams we forego
    • Federal & Postal Disability Retirement Benefits: Memories
    • OPM Disability Retirement: OWCP, EEOC, Grievances & the Comfort Zone
    • FERS Disability Retirement Benefits: Jobs versus careers

Medical Retirement from Federal Government Employment: Precedents and Contingencies

Posted on October 8, 2015 by OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer

The former constitutes a prior event already established, which may influence and impact current courses and future decisions; while the latter reflects an unforeseen circumstance as yet uncertain, but one which must occur prior to triggering the subsequent act.  Both constitute events which, in their logical sequence, should be prior in time, and satisfied before going on to the next.

In law, without the precedent, there is no argument to be made, except to blaze new trails and create orientations for fresh ones, which can be a dangerous and uncertain line of argumentation.  In Hume’s laws of causal contingencies, the billiard ball which precedes the impact upon the subsequent one matters little, except for the non-existence of the “necessary connection” which is replaced by mere repetition of events.

For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who are considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal employee or the U.S. Postal worker is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, what matters is the sequential utilization of the duality of concepts.

Precedents of law are there to be argued as strengthening one’s own Federal Disability Retirement application, by citing prior issues already decided upon primarily by the U.S.Merit Systems Protection Board and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Contingencies are the pragmatic decisions made by the Federal or Postal applicant, determining the sequence of preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through OPM, in order to present a cogent, coherent and persuasive Federal Disability Retirement case.

Federal Disability Retirement applications prepared and presented lacking the coherency of sequential establishment of contingencies unsatisfied, are tantamount to cases which have no precedents; and the duality of combined mishaps represent a meandering of a rudderless ship.  It is both together which make for an effective OPM Disability Retirement case:  the logical sequence of presentation, and the citing of relevant legal precedents in presenting an effective, coherent, cogent and persuasive Federal Disability Retirement application.  And, in the end, isn’t that what we are shooting for?

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

 

Filed under: Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted | Tagged: absenteeism for sickness federal employee, application of case laws on federal disability retirement claims, atc fers disability retirement lawyer, citing legal precedents in opm disability law, civil service hostile work environment causing anxiety and panic attacks, common injuries or illnesses in usps post office which qualify for owcp retirement, compiling evidence in a sequential manner, contacting dol owcp or opm disability offices about approvals, disability reasons or conditions for federal medical retirement, disability retirement opm lawyer will contact local hr, discrimination for filing an accident medical injury usps, dod employee mental depression disability retirement, fed employee and removal because of a work related injury and opm, federal attorney for disability for copd, federal disability case laws from the mspb and federal circuit court of appeals, federal disability retirement due to paranoia, federal disability retirement questions, federal disability retirement return to work, federal employee disability retirement reasonable accommodation, federal government benefits after removal sick federal employee, fers and disability compensation, fers diabetes, fers early medical retirement blog, fers federal medical retirement, help with documentation to support an opm medical claim, help with standard form 3112 for disability, hostile work environment government employees, how to leave usps on stress medical leave, in owcp length of benefit is not supposed to be permanent, injured and reinstated fers employee, injuries owcp excepts, interpretation of judge-made decisions in opm disability cases, knowing federal disability law but being careful with overquoting case laws, law enforcement disability retirement, lawyers and doctors should cooperate on your opm medical report writing, leave of absence opm, medical separation from usps, mental disability thru usps (postal service), multiple sclerosis civil service benefits, opm and owcp and assisted living options for federal employees, opm disability retirement attorney serving north florida residents, opm federal disability retirement for law enforcement, opm fers retirement handbook and blog, opm gs excessive absenteeism, opm medical inability to perform and attorney consultation, opm supervisor harassment against disabled employees to force to resign, owcp, owcp and early retirement due to new illnesses, owcp and fibromyalgia retirement, owcp retirement forum, owcp stress claims and opm disability retirement, owcp stress retirement, owcp totally or partial disability retirement, panic attacks hostile work environment in federal employment, physicians statement fers 3112 help, postal retirement washington dc disability, postal service opm and fitness for duty examinations, proposal for removal from federal employment medical inability, qualifications for medical retirement under fers, quoting case laws in fers disability compensation claims, sf 3107 application for immediate retirement duel to anxiety, sf 3107 application for immediate retirement for medical condition, sf 3112 info, sf 3112c physician's statement and help from experienced attorney, sf3112a, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the federal disability retirement attorney's weapon: effective arguments from past case laws, types of questions to ask about medical retirement for fers for free first time initial consultation, understanding opm disability judge-made laws, us government civilian ptsd disability claims, using effective case laws in your medical claim for early out, using legal precedents in your opm disability application, usps disability resignation form, usps hr shared service center greensboro nc attention disability retirement, usps log term sick leave after car accident, usps notice of proposed termination for medical condition, when an usps attorney or federal lawyer quotes judge-made opm law decisions, when opm hostile workplace causes stress and depression, workers comp disability retirement blog, working part-time to survive while waiting for opm disability approval, workman's comp disability versus regular disability in federal government, workplace bullying in the federal government depression, worried about lies in form 3112b supervisor's statement, wrongful medical termination and usps | Leave a comment »

The Sequence of Steps during Federal Disability Retirement Filing

Posted on October 21, 2014 by OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer

Confusion often results in a meandering of purposes; on a graph, it is rarely the linear focus of a clear start point with an end goal; instead, the zig-zagging effect of wasted energies manifests a lack of insight into the procedural methodologies which should be followed in any endeavor.  Just as a broken clock can be correct in telling time twice in a 24-hour period, so an endeavor engaged can sometimes result in an effective product, but one should never rely upon the statistical chance that success will result from confusion.

In a complex conundrum of an administrative, bureaucratic process, such as that represented by filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits for Federal and Postal workers under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, it is important to employ a clearly goal-oriented, methodological approach in completing an effective Federal Disability Retirement packet.

Yes, there are many forms to complete (SF 3107 for FERS employees; SF 2801 for CSRS & CSRS Offset; SF 3112 series for all three, FERS, CSRS & CSRS Offset); yes, the tentacles of administrative and procedural requirements are numerous and overlapping, creating a confused cauldron of conundrums one cannot fathom to complete in a rational manner; and, yes, there is an amalgamation of tasks to complete, all within the context of dealing with the medical condition itself, the problems at work (if one is still employed with one’s agency), and the worries overwhelming with future concerns.

But the options are clear and limited; the reasons for filing for Federal OPM Disability Retirement benefits are clear and unequivocal:  as choices in life reflect a linear path with few outlets beyond the stated goal, it is important to identify the efficacy of the steps which are required, and to implement them in the proper sequence in order to reach the intended target:  an approval from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

 

Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package | Tagged: a federal attorney's legal methodology and approach, a logically connected and sequential fers medical application claim, a proven trial-and-error methodology to get you qualified for federal disability retirement under fers or csrs, a sequential submission of the fers disability forms in the opm application packet, an effective foolproof approach to present and prove a federal disability retirement case in a sequential manner, articles about fers medical retirement from opm disability attorney, assistance from an experienced fers attorney, attorney with experienced on opm disability retirement, best lawyer help in cases of fers injury medical and economic compensation, claim with owcp and opm disability attorney, compiling evidence in a sequential manner, completing an effective fers medical application, CSRS disability attorney, csrs medical retirement attorney, department of defense medical retirement lawyer, disability csrs lawyer, disability lawyer, dol or opm medical attorney, effective formulation of a federal medical based retirement application, employee with physical restrictions help from csrs fers lawyer, establishing key foundations in the initial fers disability application, experienced attorney for chronically ill employees working in the government sector, experienced fers retirement attorney for physical or mental incapacities, explaining your case with medical documentation and legal statements in a clear and sequential manner, fbi fers medical lawyer, federal lawyer with experience on cases of incapacitation due to a chronically disabling condition, fers federal employee's medical retirement attorney, fers med compensation attorney, fers retirement lawyer helping federal and postal employees with disabilities, filing medical retirement forms in a logical sequence, finding an attorney for fers disability claims, following a linear approach during the federal disability retirement application and process, formulating an almost perfect federal disability application, injured postal employee looking forfers medical application and lawyer, injury compensation retirement fers lawyer, law enforcement opm med retirement lawyer, medical usps lawyer, methodology to formulate an effective usps disability retirement claim, owcp fed disability retirement attorney, owcp med retirement attorney, owcp medical retirement lawyer, owcp usps lawyer for med retirement, planning how to approach your federal disability retirement application, poor health with fed employees and fers disability attorney, post office medical retirement lawyer, pursuing a better methodology to get your opm medical claim approved, qualified fers and csrs disability lawyer, rehab opm lawyer, securing fers or csrs disability benefits with the assistance of a top federal employee attorney, sequential developments of a medical condition in the federal or government workplace, sick employee seeks qualified opm medical retirement lawyer, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the approach and methodology a disabled federal employee needs, the best method to formulate an initial federal medical application for retirement, the imperfect sequence of filing and urgent federal disability retirement claim, the invaluable legal counseling from one of the most experienced attorneys in the field of fers medical retirement, the most successful methodology for your federal disability retirement application, the necessary logical connection among documents and medical information among the disability retirement forms, the right approach when preparing a federal disability retirement packet, the sequence of preparing a federal disability retirement application, the sequential and persuasive use of language throughout the fers medical retirement process, using the cogent argument methodology to get your fers disability claim, workers comp opm | Leave a comment »

Federal Employee’s Medical Retirement Programs: Propriety of Sequence

Posted on July 11, 2014 by Federal Disability Retirement Attorney

Propriety is not a concept which is much discussed, anymore.  That which is socially or morally “proper” has been discarded, precisely because convention is no longer accepted as a standard to follow.  But when the consistent pursuance of the opposite of X becomes the acceptable standard, does it not then become the convention itself?

Further, some levels of propriety follow upon the thoughtful order of things, and are imposed not because they are artificial societal creations mandated through a history of traditions; rather, it is so because of common sense.  For example, while having a urinal right beside each table in a restaurant may be the most naturally convenient place for utilitarian purposes, the propriety of such placement defies the convention of modesty and privacy concerns; and so it goes.

Sequential propriety is often the best example of logically-imposed events, and failing to follow the linear approach may have unforeseen consequences erupting with problems down the road.  Thus, teaching a child to stop, look, listen — then to cross the road, is both logical, of utility, and linear, with a rational foundation for following upon the sequence of actions.

For Federal and Postal employees contemplating the preparation of a Federal Disability Retirement application, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, the propriety of sequential formulation of one’s Federal Disability Retirement application is important before proceeding. When should the Federal or Postal employee’s Statement of Disability be prepared? When should the Supervisor be approached to complete the Supervisor’s Statement? What should be the sequence and priority of listing of the medical conditions which make up the core of one’s Federal Disability Retirement application? Sequence of propriety is often a combination of naturally-imposed events, as well as logically sound determinations.

Throwing out convention is fine for the unthinking; but there have been many a thoughtless child who, like the symbolism in the well-known story of Holden Caulfield, comes too near the edge of a cliff in a field of rye to deserve comfort of thought and actions.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

 

Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a better methodology to get your opm disability claim approved, a federal attorney's legal methodology and approach, a logically connected and consistent fers disability application claim, a proven trial-and-error methodology to get you qualified for federal disability retirement under fers or csrs, a tailored and flexible approach to filing for fers disability, an effective foolproof approach to present and prove a federal disability retirement case on behalf of our clients, an effective formulation of a federal disability retirement claim, approving your opm disability retirement with an objective foundation, compiling evidence in a sequential manner, connecting legal standards and sufficiency tests, consistency in all the parts of the OPM application package, disability retirement consequences of self-treatment, establishing key foundations in the initial fers disability application, explaining your case with medical documentation and legal statements in a clear and sequential manner, filing medical retirement forms in a logical sequence, following a linear approach during the federal disability retirement application and process, formulating an almost perfect federal disability application, how to approach a federal disability retirement case, laying the foundation for subsequent federal disability stages, legal foundations for a strong fers disability case, methodology to make your fers disability case more persuasive, planning how to approach your federal disability retirement application, sequential developments of a medical condition in the federal or government workplace, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, taking a pragmatic approach to fers disability retirement, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the approach and methodology a disabled federal employee needs, the best method to formulate an initial federal disability application, the best way to formulate an usps disability retirement claim, the complex medical and especially legal terminology hiding those connections and definitions you need to prove in a federal disability retirement claim, the imperfect sequence of filing and urgent federal disability retirement claim, the most successful methodology for your federal disability retirement application, the necessary logical connection among documents and medical information among the disability retirement forms, the right approach when preparing a federal disability retirement packet, the sequence of preparing a federal disability retirement application, the sequential and persuasive use of language throughout the federal disability retirement process, using the cogent argument methodology to get your fers disability claim approved | Leave a comment »

OPM Disability Retirement: Problem of the Lowest Common Denominator

Posted on May 21, 2014 by Federal Disability Retirement Attorney

What is wrong with going to the essence of the matter, skipping the process, and reducing everything to its lowest common denominator? Doesn’t efficiency demand such an approach? Isn’t the most effective method of attaining an end, to identify the units of measurement which determine the outcome of a potential formula, then to focus upon developing such units and discarding the ancillary components?

The problem with such an approach, of course, should be self-evident: it ignores the meticulous procedural steps which comprise the importance of process. “Process” is often ignored by the second and subsequent generational leaders. It is likened to doing away with the social courtesies and rituals surrounding an activity.

In religious contexts, it represents the sacred steps which one must embrace in order to complete the ritual itself; and, in some societies, the process itself is of greater importance than the completion and attainment of the objective for which it is engaged. To ignore the process and merely piece together the lowest common denominators, is to undermine the relevance of the activity itself. Sequence of ritualistic application is important; how one does it, is often of greater relevance than what one does.

For Federal and Postal employees who suffer from a medical condition, such that the medical condition prevents one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, the time for consideration in filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, has come to a critical point of fruition. But filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is not merely a matter of filling out forms (SF 3107 series for FERS, along with SF 3112 series; SF 2801 series for CSRS, along with SF 3112); for, if that were the case, one should simply do so post-haste.

But that would be a self-defeating proposition; and once the U.S. Office of Personnel Management receives that Federal Disability Retirement application based upon the approach of the lowest common denominator, they may well respond with a similar unit of division: one which takes into account merely the numerical efficiency of a denial, and not the human reality of one’s medical condition.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: after much time and reflection the time for disability retirement filing is now, allowing a very small time for reflection among the primary themes of the federal disability retirement application, applying for disability in the postal service, applying for federal disability retirement is not about merely filing out a bunch of standard forms, attorney for civil service disability claims, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, csrs disability retirement guidance, denying fers disability applications for the sake of simplicity?, disability retirement and reasonable accommodation or reassignment, disability retirement application, disability retirement application federal employees, federal disability blog, federal disability retirement in any state of territory of the United States, federal disability retirement lawyer with many years of experience, federal disability retirement legal assistance, federal disability retirement rules, federal employee disability under fers, fehb benefits on disability retirement federal and postal employees, fers disability and other options, fers federal disability retirement application, filing and pursuing a disability retirement application, filing medical retirement forms in a logical sequence, following numerical efficiency denials after receiving many federal disability retirement applications, I need help with owcp or disability retirement, just denied for fers disability retirement, law firm opm disability, law firm serving disabled federal workers all across america, lawyer representing federal employees for disability retirement throughout the united states, long term federal disability retirement, nationwide federal disability law firm, owcp and disability retirement, owcp and opm federal government, owcp disability and fers retirement, partial owcp disability, post office owcp disability, postal disability retirement blog, questions & answers about fers federal disability retirement, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the imperfect sequence of filing and urgent federal disability retirement claim, the lowest common denominator concept in federal disability retirement theory, the numerical efficiency of a fers disability retirement denial, the sequence of decisions made by the opm, usps disability retirement health benefits | Leave a comment »

  • More on CSRS & FERS Disability Retirement

    • eZineArticles.com Article: The 1 Year Statute of Limitations
    • Federal Disability Retirement Laws, Medical Conditions, and the Intersecting Complications with OWCP, Social Security and FERS & CSRS
    • Federal Disability Retirement: The Full Arsenal of Weapons
    • FedSmith.com Article: Revisiting "Accommodation"
    • FedSmith.com Article: Sometimes the Process is just as important as the Substance of an Argument
    • Latest PostalReporter.com Article: Causation in a Federal Disability Retirement Case
    • Understanding the Complexities of the Law
    • USPS Disability Blog: The National Reassessment Program, the Agency and the Worker
  • Other Resources for Federal and Postal Employees

    • Articles Published in the Postal Reporter
    • FAQs on OPM Disability Retirement
    • FERS Disability Attorney Profile at Lawyers.com
    • Main Website on Federal Disability Retirement
    • OPM Disability Blog
    • The Postal Service Disability Retirement Blog
  • Seven False Myths about OPM Disability Retirement

    1) I have to be totally disabled to get Postal or Federal disability retirement.
    False: You are eligible for disability retirement so long as you are unable to perform one or more of the essential elements of your job.  Thus, it is a much lower standard of disability. 

    2) My injury or illness has to be job-related.
    False: You can get disability even if your condition is not work related.  If your medical condition impacts your ability to perform any of the core elements of your job, you are eligible, regardless of how or where your condition occurred.

    3) I have to quit my federal job first to get disability.
    False: In most cases, you can apply while continuing to work at your present job, to the extent you are able.  

    4) I can't get disability if I suffer from a mental or nervous condition.
    False: If your condition affects your job performance, you can still qualify. Psychiatric conditions are treated no differently from physical conditions.

    5) Disability retirement is approved by DOL Workers Comp.
    False: It's the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) the federal agency that administers and approves disability for employees at the US Postal Service or other federal agencies.

    6) I can wait for OPM disability retirement for many years after separation.
    False: You only have one year from the date of separation from service - otherwise, you lose your right forever.

    7) If I get disability retirement, I won't be able to apply for Scheduled Award (SA).
    False: You can get a Scheduled Award under the rules of OWCP even after you get approved for OPM disability retirement.
  • Calendar

    January 2021
    S M T W T F S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
    « Dec    
  • Archives

    • January 2021 (15)
    • December 2020 (28)
    • November 2020 (26)
    • October 2020 (27)
    • September 2020 (26)
    • August 2020 (26)
    • July 2020 (28)
    • June 2020 (26)
    • May 2020 (26)
    • April 2020 (26)
    • March 2020 (26)
    • February 2020 (25)
    • January 2020 (27)
    • December 2019 (28)
    • November 2019 (27)
    • October 2019 (27)
    • September 2019 (25)
    • August 2019 (27)
    • July 2019 (28)
    • June 2019 (23)
    • May 2019 (27)
    • April 2019 (26)
    • March 2019 (26)
    • February 2019 (24)
    • January 2019 (28)
    • December 2018 (27)
    • November 2018 (27)
    • October 2018 (27)
    • September 2018 (25)
    • August 2018 (27)
    • July 2018 (27)
    • June 2018 (26)
    • May 2018 (27)
    • April 2018 (22)
    • March 2018 (26)
    • February 2018 (24)
    • January 2018 (27)
    • December 2017 (26)
    • November 2017 (27)
    • October 2017 (26)
    • September 2017 (26)
    • August 2017 (27)
    • July 2017 (26)
    • June 2017 (26)
    • May 2017 (28)
    • April 2017 (25)
    • March 2017 (27)
    • February 2017 (24)
    • January 2017 (26)
    • December 2016 (29)
    • November 2016 (26)
    • October 2016 (26)
    • September 2016 (26)
    • August 2016 (27)
    • July 2016 (26)
    • June 2016 (26)
    • May 2016 (28)
    • April 2016 (26)
    • March 2016 (27)
    • February 2016 (25)
    • January 2016 (26)
    • December 2015 (25)
    • November 2015 (24)
    • October 2015 (27)
    • September 2015 (25)
    • August 2015 (26)
    • July 2015 (28)
    • June 2015 (26)
    • May 2015 (25)
    • April 2015 (25)
    • March 2015 (26)
    • February 2015 (22)
    • January 2015 (26)
    • December 2014 (27)
    • November 2014 (22)
    • October 2014 (26)
    • September 2014 (26)
    • August 2014 (26)
    • July 2014 (27)
    • June 2014 (25)
    • May 2014 (26)
    • April 2014 (26)
    • March 2014 (26)
    • February 2014 (24)
    • January 2014 (27)
    • December 2013 (25)
    • November 2013 (25)
    • October 2013 (26)
    • September 2013 (26)
    • August 2013 (27)
    • July 2013 (27)
    • June 2013 (25)
    • May 2013 (27)
    • April 2013 (26)
    • March 2013 (26)
    • February 2013 (24)
    • January 2013 (26)
    • December 2012 (26)
    • November 2012 (25)
    • October 2012 (26)
    • September 2012 (23)
    • August 2012 (27)
    • July 2012 (22)
    • June 2012 (26)
    • May 2012 (24)
    • April 2012 (25)
    • March 2012 (25)
    • February 2012 (25)
    • January 2012 (25)
    • December 2011 (26)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (26)
    • September 2011 (25)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (26)
    • May 2011 (25)
    • April 2011 (25)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (22)
    • January 2011 (23)
    • December 2010 (25)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (25)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (25)
    • July 2010 (28)
    • June 2010 (26)
    • May 2010 (29)
    • April 2010 (30)
    • March 2010 (26)
    • February 2010 (22)
    • January 2010 (23)
    • December 2009 (20)
    • November 2009 (19)
    • October 2009 (22)
    • September 2009 (18)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (23)
    • June 2009 (18)
    • May 2009 (11)
    • April 2009 (11)
    • March 2009 (14)
    • February 2009 (10)
    • January 2009 (10)
    • December 2008 (8)
    • November 2008 (8)
    • October 2008 (6)
    • September 2008 (4)
    • August 2008 (9)
    • July 2008 (8)
    • June 2008 (6)
    • May 2008 (18)
    • April 2008 (20)
    • March 2008 (31)

Blog at WordPress.com. WP Designer.