The problem with submitting a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS based upon the “quantitative approach” (submitting a voluminous medical file which, by the sheer weight, extent and thickness of the file, reveals the severity of the multiple medical conditions) is that it often fails to provide the proper bridge between the particular medical condition a Federal or Postal employee suffers from, and the impact upon the essential elements of one’s job.
Certainly, medical records, notes, diagnostic test results, etc., can provide a narrative delineation of one’s continuing medical conditions — but the question becomes, a narrative to what end? The Office of Personnel Management will often review a large stack of medical documentation and simply conclude that there has been insufficient medical documentation, and further, that the medical documentation submitted fails to show that such conditions are severe enough to prevent one from perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job. That is because the mere existence of a medical condition — no matter how extensive such medical conditions have required in terms of hospitalizations, testing, surgical or other procedures, etc. — is not enough to satisfy, by a preponderance of the evidence, the criteria applicable for eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.
Remember, always use the golden rule: quality over quantity. And in a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, quality means the bridging of that conceptual gap between the medical condition, and the essential elements of one’s job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: all conditions listed in the application should explain the "nexus", anticipating how the opm will try to deny your federal disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoiding a quantitative approach when filing for opm disability retirement, building a strong opm claim doesn't take lots of medical documents, choosing what medical documents you want the opm to see, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, deciding what medical documentation is relevant to your opm claim, emphasizing quality in submitting opm medical records, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement and the-more-the-better- fallacy, FERS medical retirement, getting quality and substantial medical documentation, getting relevant medical documentation key in securing opm disability, how to anticipate possible problems in your postal disability application, how to avoid the owcp's "insufficient medical documentation" excuse, how to win an OPM disability case, insufficient medical documentation for OPM disability, large amount of medical documentation for opm disability retirement, Medical Documentation for OPM Disability Retirement, medical documentation guidelines, medical documentation required to get an opm disability approval, medical documentation tools used to prove a usps disability case, more about the medical documentation in the fers disability application, more than enough medical documentation, nationwide representation of federal employees, nexus between medical disability and job performance, OPM disability application tips, opm disability tips for non lawyers, owcp disability retirement, place quality over quantity, preponderance of the evidence documents, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, recommendations and tips for the opm disability application, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, submitting a voluminous amount of medical documentation to the opm, the ''insufficient medical documentation'' argument, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the nexus you must prove in a fers disability claim, tips for federal workers filing for disability, tips for us government employees on disability retirement, USPS disability retirement, usps medical documentation requirements, what documents should I turn over opm for my disability claim?, what is really important is the nexus of medical condition and job performance | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Focusing upon the Bridge
In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, the multitude of aspects in preparing the application will often lend itself to detracting and distracting from the primary elements of an effective application and presentation.
Thus, worries about what the Supervisor will or will not say; whether the Agency will mis-characterize a supposed “good deed” they performed by declaring it to be an “accommodation”, with the danger that such declaration and characterization will be accepted by the Clerk at the Office of Personnel Management as true, etc. — all of these take away from the essence of creating that important bridge between one’s medical conditions and the essential elements of one’s positional duties.
Because the vast majority of denials issued by the Office of Personnel Management are based upon “insufficient medical documentation”, an undue focus upon other elements of a Federal Disability Retirement application would not be an intelligent utilization of one’s time and effort.
While OPM will certainly argue that the Agency has “accommodated” the Federal or Postal employee (and use that term improperly 9 times out of 10); and while OPM will point to elements in a Supervisor’s Statement as a further basis for a denial; each such supplemental argument by the Office of Personnel Management is nevertheless based upon the centrality of a primary argument, in most cases: Insufficient Medical Documentation.
As such, it is prudent to focus one’s efforts upon the primary basis which provides the foundation for an effective Federal Disability Retirement application: The bridge between one’s medical conditions, and the essential elements of one’s job.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accommodation issues in FERS disability retirement, all conditions listed in the application should explain the "nexus", attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability retirement, insufficient medical documentation for OPM disability, neutralizing negative statements from supervisor's statements in sf 3112b, Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements, nexus between medical disability and job performance, OPM disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, primary elements of an effective fers disability application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, starting with generic information about the nexus, the ''insufficient medical documentation'' argument, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the federal disability bridge, USPS disability retirement, what is really important is the nexus of medical condition and job performance | Leave a comment »