In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, it is obviously important to construct an effective bridge, or nexus, between one’s identified medical conditions and the type of positional duties which one performs at the Federal Agency or the U.S. Postal Service.
In doing so, one should keep in mind certain essential points, each from the perspective of the Office of Personnel Management (which is the agency which will determine whether the Federal or Postal employee/applicant’s Federal Disability Retirement application will be approved or denied).
For instance, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will only consider those medical conditions which are identified in the Applicant’s Statement of Disability (SF 3112A). Once a CSA Number (an administrative identifier which is assigned by OPM — an eight-digit number beginning with “4” for CSRS employees and ending with a “0”; and for FERS employees, beginning with an “8” and ending with a “0”) is assigned to an application, the Federal or Postal employee is no longer able to add any further medical conditions without withdrawing the application completely, and re-submitting it anew.
Further, while the Office of Personnel Management will consider specific duties and descriptions of duties which are delineated and expanded upon in the narrative portion of SF 3112A, it is the “official” position description which will ultimately be controlling. Thus, a logical variance from the official position description as to what a Federal or Postal employee does, will not make any difference. However, if what the Federal or Postal employee states that he or she is doing, is completely at odds with what the positional description states that he or she should be doing, then the controlling default will be the official position description.
It is wise to keep these two perspectives in mind, in creating an effective bridge for a Federal Disability Retirement application. For, ultimately, it is the perspective from the “other side” which matters, and as such, OPM’s perspective of how a Federal Disability Retirement application is reviewed and considered, is an important aspect in preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: adding medical documentation after submitting federal disability application, all conditions listed in the application should explain the "nexus", attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability, competing informational perspectives and fers disability retirement, explaining job duties in your federal disability retirement, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, from the perspective of the office of personnel management, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, my occupational duties in the fers disability application, OPM disability retirement, opm's perspective of your medical condition, owcp disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the federal disability bridge, the nexus you must prove in a fers disability claim, the positional duties that the opm will consider during the fers/csrs disabilty application, until when I can add a medical condition to my opm disability claim?, USPS disability retirement, what medical conditions will the opm consider? | Leave a comment »
