In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application with the Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS (Federal Employee’s Retirement System) or CSRS (Civil Service Retirement System), in preparing and formulating the Applicant’s Statement of Disability on Standard Form 3112A, it is important to distinguish between the medical conditions which are diagnosed, from the symptoms which are experienced by the Federal or Postal employee. The focus is often upon the latter (the symptoms) as opposed to the former (the officially diagnosed medical conditions), as it should be because of the nature of the requirements in proving a Federal Disability Retirement case with the Office of Personnel Management.
By that is meant the following: Because one must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that one is eligible and entitled to Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM, by exhibiting a nexus between one’s medical conditions and one’s medical inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, the descriptive analysis of such bridging between one’s medical condition and the impact upon one’s ability/inability to perform the essential elements of one’s particular job, is quite naturally focused upon the symptomatologies which one experiences.
The blurring of the lines between the “official” medical condition as itemized in a list of diagnoses, as opposed to the descriptive delineation of the exhibited symptoms, or the symptoms which are subjectively experienced and (often) correlated by objective radiological reports, is a natural occurrence. Often, the two are (and should be) deliberately intermingled in the narrative description of the Applicant’s Statement of Disability. However, one should always write the narrative portion of the SF 3112A with the view towards the future potential issues which may arise: that of being “disabled” for a specifically-identified medical condition.
Sometimes the OPM Representative will specifically identify a medical condition; sometimes, no such identification will occur. Then, there are times when the lines between “diagnosis” and “symptoms” naturally crosses — as in, “Chronic Pain Syndrome” as distinguished from “chronic pain”. Blurring the lines in a discussion is expected and should be applied in formulating one’s Applicant’s Statement of Disability; but such blurring should occur with deliberation and purpose, and not just because one does not recognize the distinction between the two.
As with everything in life, the consequences of doing something by accident are quite different from that which results from a purposive and deliberate action.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: applicant's statement of disability, are the symptoms more important than the diagnostics?, civil service disability retirement, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing the applicable symptoms in the usps disability application, differentiating symptoms and conditions in an opm narrative report, explaining the symptoms of your medical condition to the opm, Federal Disability, federal disability form sf3112a questions, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, making sure that you describe all the symptoms of your medical condition, medical condition's symptomatology and opm disability retirement, medical conditions symptoms and the opm disability applicant, nexus between medical disability and job performance, one more opportunity to explain nexus, OPM disability retirement, opm medical diagnosis and treatments, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, Postal Service disability, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, the federal disability bridge, the limited importance of a formal diagnosis in a federal disability retirement claim, the symptoms and the diagnosis in the narrative report, USPS disability retirement, what to write in the 3112a? | Leave a comment »