Have you ever sat with company at a dinner table, and engaged in a conversation where it appears as if you are continuing someone else’s conversation? Or your presence is merely a substitute for an extension of a previous debate or discussion? Where a topic is brought up, and immediately a barrage of critical attacks — of arguments you have never made, and of statements you don’t recall disseminating (and where this is only 5 minutes into the salad and you’ve barely tasted the first glass of wine)?
The problem with unfinished business is that the transference of what one wanted to say is normally unloaded upon the wrong subject. Conversations, debates, forums of intellectual exercises in linguistic battles — it is a rare person who has been able to convey the full force of one’s collective thoughts and beliefs on the matter, and it is more often the case that one leaves with the regretful remorse of, “I wish I had brought that point up…” But rarely do second chances present themselves in a satisfactory follow-up forum; unless you are the unfortunate object for an unexpected dinner invitation.
In responding to a denial of a Federal Disability Retirement application with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the applicant — through his or her Federal Disability Retirement attorney — needs to understand that the person who issues the denial will not be the same person who will review any additional submissions or legal arguments at the Reconsideration Stage.
It will be reviewed, in legal parlance, de novo. As such, while the basis of the denial as issued by the Caseworker at OPM at the First Level should be taken into consideration, one should approach the case in light of the following question: To what extent will the Reconsideration Branch care as to the original basis of the denial of the first caseworker? If it is being reviewed de novo, the approach should be to go over all of the elements — and to reinforce and amend those weak points, some of which may overlap what the first caseworker pointed out, others which may not.
It may not be the best approach to argue to a dinner guest who wasn’t present at the first round of arguments; the points you are trying to make may not be heard because the bell has already rung, and the fighter in the second round has been replaced with someone upon whom you have never previously landed a punch.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage | Tagged: a different opm case worker will review a federal disability appeal, appeal reconsideration in cases of medical retirement for federal employees, appealing to an opm disability application denial to get a second denial, apwu retirement disability, asking the opm disability administration office to reconsider its first decision, attorney representing federal employees, de novo concept in fers disability retirement, de novo process in OPM disability law, disability insurance for postal and federal employees, discretion with the opm in handling a federal disability reconsideration, federal disability retirement, federal injury blogs, FERS disability retirement, how to handle the reconsideration stage, how to respond to a federal disability retirement denial, I need a lawyer to help me with my disability retirement with the post office, if your opm disability claim was unfairly denied, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyer representing postal workers, moving forward into a complex federal disability retirement process, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm application for disability benefits, OPM denied my FERS disability claim, OPM disability retirement, OPM Reconsideration Stage, owcp disability retirement, persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, postal workers denied benefits, reasons why the opm can deny disability application, representing federal employees in and outside the country, responding to a denial of fers disability benefits with the basic statutory requirements in mind, Responding to an Initial Federal Disability Retirement Denial of Benefits, some further thoughts on the opm reconsideration stage, the "nuts and bolts" of federal disability retirement, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the nexus and the accommodation issues must be emphasized during the fers disability reconsideration stage, the opm at the second stage of the opm disability process, the opm case worker at the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, the second appeal process to get fers disability retirement benefits, the second stage opm representative, the weakest statement is used many times by opm to deny disability, usps disability blog, when it looks that your fers disability claim is heading towards reconsideration, when opm disability retirement is denied, will a fers disability reconsideration be approved? | Leave a comment »