The abundance of metaphors comparing life with sports has pervaded throughout in literature, opinion pieces, articles, etc. We can relate to sports, because many have been active participants in their youth; continue to engage in it via playing in various adult leagues, or coaching their kids, or perhaps just passively enjoying watching various sports on television, etc.
As a metaphor, it is seen as a “life-lesson”. It is supposed to teach all aspects of “building character” — of the value of hard work, proper preparation, ethical conduct and behavior, etc. In pragmatic terms, when one actually plays a sport, it merely becomes a one-to-one adversarial encounter with an opponent, and sometimes teaches merely that the “playing field” is not always level, and the opponent does not always follow the same rules of the game as one is taught to do.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, a comparative metaphor to any sports would be to characterize the entire administrative process as one of the battle between David and Goliath. The Office of Personnel Management has its own set of rules — of a criteria which is allegedly applied, but which often has limited rational basis; of a time frame within which they say they attempt to meet, but which is systematically ignored; of following rules and regulations as they interpret them, etc.
What would one say about a sport in which one side makes up the rules and then ignores them? Disability Retirement from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, is like a professional football team (representing OPM) going against a high school chemistry class deciding to put together a team (the Federal or Postal employee). The teams are unequal; the playing field is never level; and the outcome of the encounter must therefore be decided by careful preparation, a cohesively formulated plan, and a filing deliberation which results in a compelling total package.
Such is the metaphor with sports: to prepare, formulate and file — in an effective manner.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations Tagged: | approving a federal disability retirement application, attorney representing federal employees, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement, csrs disability retirement and the rules of the game, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fighting to get federal government disability, getting ready to fight the battle to win your disability compensation benefits, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyer representing postal workers, one comparative metaphor to the federal disability applicant versus the opm, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, playing the opm's game to win your disability benefits, Postal disability, postal personal injury and the rules of the game, preparing yourself to fight for your federal workers disability rights, representing federal employees from any us government agency, the disabled federal employee and the uneven game he or she can't afford to lose, the federal disability process can be characterized as the battle between David and Goliath, the fight to get approved for fers disability benefits, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the rules and criteria for disability retirement under fers/csrs, the sports methafor in the opm disability application and process, USPS disability retirement, when federal disability retirement applicants should know their adversaries, when the opm makes its own rules to later ignore them