It is like those siblings who are “in between”; of caught in relevance and significance by being squeezed on the one side by the “giant first one”, and on the other side by an even greater presence; and, somehow, the middle stage is lost and forgotten. Is that how life itself is viewed, as well? Of being cooed and oohed over the baby-years, and then forgotten once the younger sister comes into the family; or of being cast aside by children in their teenage years, then suddenly realizing that time lost can never be regained, but recognizing that one’s parents now are too old to appreciate?
Is that why the “Middle Ages” are viewed as irrelevant, stuck between the “Ancient Era” of the great Roman and Greek periods, and then suddenly skipped over into the Renaissance and into modernity?
The “Middle Stage” is like the Middle Age years — of being present but quickly fading; of being there but barely noticed; of shying away and fearing the next stage because the one before was so full of energy and the disappointment of the failures of the previous stage is merely a foresight into the fearful expectations of the next.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition such that the medical condition now prevents the Federal or Postal employee from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal job, the “Middle Stage” is called the “Reconsideration Stage” of the administrative process.
The Reconsideration Stage is the stage where the Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application has been denied at the Initial Stage, and it is the Stage before the Third Stage — an appeal to the U.S.Merit Systems Protection Board. It is not a stage to be “overlooked” — as some inevitability of a further denial — but one which provides for an opportunity to enhance and add to one’s Federal Disability Retirement application by providing additional medical and other documentation in order to obtain an approval from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset.
If the applicant decided to forego consulting with an attorney at the Initial Stage of the Federal Disability Retirement process, then it is a good time to consider contacting an attorney at the “Middle Stage” — the Reconsideration Stage of the process — to discuss the next and crucial steps in order to correct any past mistakes and affirmatively assert the proper legal basis in meeting the preponderance of the evidence criteria in your quest to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage | Tagged: abuse of power by federal government supervisor and fers disability retirement, anxiety disorder for medical retirement opm?, attorney for medical retirement federal, awol in the federal government due to extreme stess, bulging disc from work opm, bullying stress policy for federal employees, cervical spondylosis among air traffic controllers, coming off federal workmans comp and plan b, federal civilian supervisor abuse of title or authority causing stress, federal disability qualifications are not based on a “list” of impairments but on job-condition bridge, federal disability retirement accommodations, federal disability retirement percentages, federal employee disability and spousal support with decision, federal employee evaluation performance rating requirement for disabled employees, federal employee medical retirement, fers disability retirement attorney serving san antonio texas employees, fers disability retirement attorney serving vermont residents, fers disability retirement handbook, fers disability retirement law office handbook, fers disability retirement work related stress, fers retirement and medical removal, fers sf 3112, form for resignation federal service medical conditions, getting fers medical disability retirement, help interpreting opm denial of disability benefits letter and creating response appeal, how long ill federal employee awol before firing me, how to medically retire for federal employees, I’m out on injury and my federal agency employer ran me as lwop, legal assistance opm form 3112c, list of qualified disabilities under opm? qualifications are not based in a list as in ssdi, long term advanced sick leave federal government, long term disability with usps, mental stress early retirement federal employment, opm disability codes? qualification is based on how condition interferes with federal job, opm disability list of impairments, opm hostile work environment causing undue stress on federal employees, opm hostile work environment supervisor causing panic attacks, opm medical retirement processing forms help, opm reasonable accommodation, owcp and separation from postal service, owcp claim appeal status check and what to do if denied, owcp injury leave long term, owcp pay for rotator cuff surgery and contingency plan, permanent light duty in the postal service and options to be productive in another job, post office rules for employee heart attacks, postal service disability attorney, reasonable accommodation federal government, resignation letter usps medical condition, rural carriers working light duty, sample retirement letter due to disability in federal employment, samples and legal assistance opm disability physicians letter, sf 3112 disability application package, should employee be placed on leave without pay pending disability retirement, standard form 3112 for disability, tsa employees suffer from medical conditions, us dept of labor owcp long term disability, vermont disability retirement lawyer, vt opm disability retirement help, workplace harassment in federal employment and long term stress recuperation leave | Leave a comment »
Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Responding to Stupidity
Sometimes, one’s initial reaction in a situation — professional setting, social discourse, event gathering, etc. — requires a momentary pause; and it is precisely that couple of seconds of gathering one’s thoughts which saves one from further putting fuel upon a potential fire.
Perhaps you have every right to have responded with a drip of sarcasm; or others would have approved of the lashing back; and still others would say that the response was appropriate and deservedly given. But the greater question should always be: how effective was the response; did it evoke the necessary end; and for whose benefit was the aggressive retort given — for the benefit of truth, or for one’s own satisfaction?
In a professional context, of course, it is probably never appropriate to respond in an unprofessional way, if merely by definition alone. Similarly, in a FERS or CSRS Federal Disability Retirement context, when one receives a denial from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there are statements made — whether one pertaining to mis-application or mis-statement of the law; or perhaps a wrong reference to a medical report; or even more egregious, a selective use of a statement from a medical report or record taken out of context — which can deservedly provoke a response involving sarcasm, a deluge of epithets, or worse, a barrage of ad hominem attacks — and in each case, it would be neither appropriately given, nor proper in a professional sense.
Fortunately, paper presentations and paper responses have the advantage of time over social discourse and person-to-person contact.
Holding one’s breath and counting 3 seconds, or 10, or perhaps an eternity, is an effective way of avoiding catastrophe. Writing a diatribe of what one wants to say, then trashing it, is also acceptable. On the other hand, beware of that “send” button; and, moreover, never push that “send to all” button.
That would indeed be unprofessional.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage, When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: a rational response to an unreasonable letter of denial opm benefits, an effective federal disability retirement application, an effective written communication to the opm, an individualized response to your fers disability denial, an understandable emotional response to an irrational fers disability decision, applying old-fashioned ethical principles in the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, denial of fers disability benefits and the proper response, effective personal skills when dealing with supervisors, emotional comments won't always help to get opm application approved, federal disability attorney, fers disability retirement and effective communication, how to respond to a federal disability retirement denial, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal effectiveness in government disability claims, legal help after first application denial, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, reflecting on emotional tone from the legal angle, refrain from fast and emotional responses when opm denies your disability claim, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, Responding to an Initial Federal Disability Retirement Denial of Benefits, response to denial of opm disability retirement benefits, Second Step OPM Appeal, the 2nd fers disability stage is still an administrative process with the opm, the date of the denial letter and responding to a denial of opm disability benefits, the dreaded denial letter, the effective way of presenting one's opm disability case, the federal disability retirement application with an emotional tone deep inside in the objective medical language used, the opm case worker at the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, the role of the applicant during the second stage, the second stage opm representative, using some emotional content in your fers disability application, USPS disability retirement, we may be talking about emotional issues or medical documentation -- but never forget the nexus | Leave a comment »