The word itself has an effective resonance — similar in tone and texture to “grandiloquence”, which implies a flourish of rhetorical verbosity; and if one were to combine the two, as in the sentence, “He spoke with verbose grandiloquence,” one need not say anything more about the subject, but the statement says it all.
Verbosity does not necessarily carry a negative connotation, for excessive use of words does not logically entail ineffectiveness. For instance, if one is attempting to kill time for a greater purpose (e.g., a lecture to the entire police department personnel while one’s co-conspirators are robbing a bank), being verbose (and while at the same time, being grandiloquent) may have a positive benefit.
On the other hand, being either verbose or grandiloquent which results in providing too much peripheral information, or information which may ultimate harm the essence of one’s foundational purpose, may in fact lead to unintended negative consequences.
Thus, in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, one must of course engage in the narrative prose — through medical reports and records; through crafting and submitting one’s Applicant’s Statement of Disability. In the course of the narrative statement of one’s disability, it is often the case that Federal and Postal Workers will tend to be “verbose”. But purposeful verbosity is the key.
Choose the words carefully. And make sure that, if along the way, you are also being grandiloquent, try not to be bombastic at the same time. Imagine that sentence: “He spoke with a bombastic, verbose grandiloquence.” That says everything.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGil, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations, Uncategorized | Tagged: a mixture of creative writing and legal requirements of opm disability eligibility, a problem with feca is that when it ends you may not be longer eligible for medical retirement, a verbose description of your medical conditions and the essential elements of your federal job, abuse of authority federal government supervisor taking action against ill federal employees, an effective written communication strategy in your fers disability claim, choosing verbose text on your federal disability retirement application, crafting effective persuasive arguments in your opm disability retirement application, dealing with a reduction of force in usps employment, dealing with inaccurate information on standard form 3112d with an attorney a board, dol owcp benefits are for short term disabilities while opm disability benefits are for long term incapacities, eeoc medical discrimination are often harder to prove than opm medical retirement claims, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal government supervisor bullying causing depression and anxiety, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and effective communication, fers retirement application sf 3107 lawyer, filing a very persuasive federal disability application, lawyer blog on how to get approved for fers medical retirement, lawyers for disability retirement appeals mspb, legal persuasion in the initial federal disability application, limited financial resources for suing usps over disability discrimination, medical retirement at post office with help of experienced private usps attorney, offer of light duty as an accommodation not real accommodation for federal employee retirement purposes, OPM disability retirement, opm medical retirement lawyer, partial disabilities postal employee, Postal disability, purposeful verbosity in the sf 3112a is the key when used effectively, requesting advice to opm medical retirement lawyer about physicians statement disability, resigning in the federal government for chronic disabilities, terminated from government employment for physically inability to perform tasks, the opm disability application and choosing carefully the right words, Tips and tricks for the filling out the Applicant's Statement of Disability, usps disability retirement process, when dealing with federal medical retirement forms know what law says you need to prove, when opm denies your disabilities claim, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability, writing a successful personal narrative report, writing communication skills in the opm disability retirement application, writing statement of disability as an art form | Leave a comment »
Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Responding to Stupidity
Sometimes, one’s initial reaction in a situation — professional setting, social discourse, event gathering, etc. — requires a momentary pause; and it is precisely that couple of seconds of gathering one’s thoughts which saves one from further putting fuel upon a potential fire.
Perhaps you have every right to have responded with a drip of sarcasm; or others would have approved of the lashing back; and still others would say that the response was appropriate and deservedly given. But the greater question should always be: how effective was the response; did it evoke the necessary end; and for whose benefit was the aggressive retort given — for the benefit of truth, or for one’s own satisfaction?
In a professional context, of course, it is probably never appropriate to respond in an unprofessional way, if merely by definition alone. Similarly, in a FERS or CSRS Federal Disability Retirement context, when one receives a denial from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, there are statements made — whether one pertaining to mis-application or mis-statement of the law; or perhaps a wrong reference to a medical report; or even more egregious, a selective use of a statement from a medical report or record taken out of context — which can deservedly provoke a response involving sarcasm, a deluge of epithets, or worse, a barrage of ad hominem attacks — and in each case, it would be neither appropriately given, nor proper in a professional sense.
Fortunately, paper presentations and paper responses have the advantage of time over social discourse and person-to-person contact.
Holding one’s breath and counting 3 seconds, or 10, or perhaps an eternity, is an effective way of avoiding catastrophe. Writing a diatribe of what one wants to say, then trashing it, is also acceptable. On the other hand, beware of that “send” button; and, moreover, never push that “send to all” button.
That would indeed be unprofessional.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage, When the OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged: a rational response to an unreasonable letter of denial opm benefits, an effective federal disability retirement application, an effective written communication to the opm, an individualized response to your fers disability denial, an understandable emotional response to an irrational fers disability decision, applying old-fashioned ethical principles in the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, denial of fers disability benefits and the proper response, effective personal skills when dealing with supervisors, emotional comments won't always help to get opm application approved, federal disability attorney, fers disability retirement and effective communication, how to respond to a federal disability retirement denial, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal effectiveness in government disability claims, legal help after first application denial, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, reflecting on emotional tone from the legal angle, refrain from fast and emotional responses when opm denies your disability claim, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, Responding to an Initial Federal Disability Retirement Denial of Benefits, response to denial of opm disability retirement benefits, Second Step OPM Appeal, the 2nd fers disability stage is still an administrative process with the opm, the date of the denial letter and responding to a denial of opm disability benefits, the dreaded denial letter, the effective way of presenting one's opm disability case, the federal disability retirement application with an emotional tone deep inside in the objective medical language used, the opm case worker at the second stage of the federal disability retirement process, the role of the applicant during the second stage, the second stage opm representative, using some emotional content in your fers disability application, USPS disability retirement, we may be talking about emotional issues or medical documentation -- but never forget the nexus | Leave a comment »