At the initial stage of the process identified as “Federal Disability Retirement” from the Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often difficult for the Federal or Postal worker to grasp the various components which must be gathered, formulated, prepared and consolidated, in order to meet the legal criteria for eligibility.
Once submitted, if an approval is received from the Office of Personnel Management, then one need not be further concerned with whether or not the legal criteria was “met” (although one should still be vigilant in doing those tasks and preparatory work in order to retain and maintain one’s right to Federal disability retirement benefits).
If a denial is received from the Office of Personnel Management, then it is necessary to file a Request for Reconsideration within the thirty (30) day time period, and begin to determine which of the multiple issues OPM has delineated as being the basis of a deficient Federal Disability Retirement application.
Some attempt to do this via a “shotgun” approach — of spraying every answer available and hoping that some of the arguments, supplemental documents, statements, etc., hit the mark in some way. A different approach is to selectively choose those issues which appear to be central to the case, and answer the essential ones, allowing for such answers to concurrently address the peripheral points brought out by OPM. A third approach is to identify and consolidate OPM’s alleged basis for the disapproval, consolidate the issues into 2 or 3 main points, then “corner” the arguments by addressing them, concluding that the Federal or Postal employee has addressed the concerns of OPM and therefore OPM should not be able to change them at the Merit Systems Protection Board.
While an MSPB appeal is conducted “de novo” (“anew” or “afresh”, without regard to any previous determinations), it is nevertheless an effective methodology to point out the malleability of OPM’s varying stances, and thereby effectively streamline that which needs to be proven at the MSPB level. A leopard which changes its spots too often loses its credibility, and making sure that OPM stays in one place is a useful tool in winning a Federal Disability Retirement application, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, blog writing on federal disability retirement issues, cornering the opm after an initial disability retirement aplication, dealing with a denied opm disability retirement, disability retirement for federal employees, evaluating your federal disability case for a potential request for consideration, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability, FERS disability retirement, learn the secrets of winning opm disability even after initial denials, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, opm disability and appeal, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement blog, opm disability secrets, opm request to appeal disability retirement, opm's reviews for federal disability elegibility, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, preparing in case of a fers disability denial, second stage opm disability retirement process, Second Step OPM Appeal, secrets for opm disability approval, the malleability of OPM's stances, the malleability of opm's varying stances, the opm at the second stage of the opm disability process, the second stage opm representative, Time limit for Request for Reconsideration in OPM disability law, usps disability blog, USPS disability retirement | Leave a comment »