Perhaps there will never be the “perfect” case in a FERS or CSRS Disability Retirement application, and one should not expect to find one. There are “near-perfections” and ones which cannot possibly be denied by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. But it is the imperfect ones — the ones which might be consider tenuous at best, but which are nevertheless approved, which provide greater lessons in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Further, denial letters issued by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management are instructive for future events and cases, precisely because they indicate the focus, in any particular context or time, of the central and essential concerns expressed by OPM. Inconsistencies are often what is reviewed and scrutinized most closely — between what the doctor asserts in conclusory fashion, in a medical narrative report, as opposed to the daily office and treatment notes; between one’s statement of disability and what the Supervisor observes; between what the applicant for Federal Disability Retirement benefits states, and what the doctor annotates.
Granted, much of it is selectively chosen with a biased and slanted perspective — as if the Caseworker at OPM had already decided to issue a denial. Further, OPM makes unfounded assertions concerning the applicable standard of law all the time, which undermines the very basis of any denial, and puts into question the credibility of the reasons given in a denial letter.
Ultimately, there is no such thing as the “perfect” case; as life provides for inconsistencies and lack of continuum, so a Federal Disability Retirement application often reflects the imperfection of life. Unfortunately, OPM doesn’t have such a philosophical outlook on such matters, and we must deal with it accordingly.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The OPM Representatives Tagged: | accepting opm disability clients all across america, addressing the reason for OPM denial, attorney with experience evaluating many submitted opm disability retirement applications, avoiding inconsistencies during the preparation of your fers disability claim, civil service disability retirement, consistency in all the parts of the OPM application package, CSRS disability retirement, deficiencies of an OPM disability denial, don't expect a perfect review of your disability retirement case under fers, evaluating your federal disability claim for inconsistencies, examining opm's rationality to deny your fers disability benefits, experience and results for federal employee disability claims, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability, FERS disability retirement, formulating an almost perfect federal disability application, inconsistencies between my doctors in my federal disability claim, natural inconsistencies in your csrs disability claim, OPM disability retirement, opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, Postal disability retirement, pursuing a ''perfect'' fers disability retirement application (as if it could be done), reasons why the opm can deny disability application, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, the experience of a federal disability retirement attorney, the experience of submitting many fers disability applications that were approved, truth and consistency across the opm disability retirement forms and statements, USPS disability retirement, what the opm does when it tries to deny fers or csrs disability applications?