I recently wrote an article in FedSmith.com where I argued that the process of argumentation is often just as important as the substance of the argument itself. For instance, technically speaking, the mere fact that a Federal or Postal employee under FERS or CSRS receives a proposed removal for one’s medical inability to perform one’s job, without actually being removed for that medical inability, does not accord one the Bruner Presumption. And, indeed, there may be various valid reasons why a Federal Agency will hold off from actually removing an employee — often to the advantage of the Federal employee.
During such a “suspension” period (sort of like being in purgatory in the Federal sector) between having a proposed removal and actually being removed, while one may not obtain the advantage in a Federal Disability Retirement application of the Bruner Presumption, one can still argue that one is essentially entitled to the Bruner Presumption, and that is often just enough to win the argument. Thus, as I argued in the FedSmith article, the process is sometimes just as effective as the substance of the argument.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Attorney, The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: a good legal argument is often as important as the substance of the argument itself, accepting opm disability clients all across america, arguing a case on behalf of an injured federal employee, argumentation and interpretation in opm disability law, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement lawyer miami fl, federal employee removal after injury, fers disability retirement legal representation mesa ar, getting legal representation in raleigh nc opm disability retirement, importance of using legal argumentation in your fers disability claim, integrity in legal arguments used on behalf of injured postal workers, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal & foundational argument, legal arguments for opm disability rights, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, medical retirement for federal us workers in cleveland, methodology of argumentation and its application in opm disability law, nationwide representation of federal employees, oakland ca federal disability attorney, opm disability negotiation process and argumentation, opm disability retirement omaha, opm's arguments can be defeated by additional processing and information, process argumentation and the substance of the opm disability case law, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, separation after injury postal worker, soundness of legal arguments used in administrative law, the appropriate factual argumentation in your specific opm disability claim, the integrity of an argument during the description of an opm claim, the qualities of an effective legal argumentation of opm disability law, validity of argumentation used on behalf of the opm disability applicants, virginia beach opm disability retirement law firm, when management wants to remove the federal worker due to disability |
OPM Disability Retirement 
Leave a Reply