At each step in the administrative process of preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the Office of Personnel Management, including any responses to denials from OPM in order to qualify for the subsequent stage of the process (i.e., a Request for Reconsideration must be filed within thirty (30) days of the denial; an appeal must be filed with the Merit Systems Protection Board, etc.), there is always the danger of becoming lost in the morass of peripheral issues, often resulting from a sense of panic upon an initial reading of correspondence received.
Thus, whether it is a letter from the Office of Personnel Management for additional medical documentation; a decision of denial at the Initial Stage of the Process; a second denial from the Office of Personnel Management — it is important to have a sense of how one must extract the essential points which must be addressed, and refuse to respond in a reactionary, ineffective manner.
Compiling an immediate response based upon an initial reading is normally a waste of time. Verbiage which takes up space on a page of paper does not in and of itself mean that it requires a substantive response. Much of what the Office of Personnel Management states can be summarized in a couple of sentences, once all of the ancillary issues are set aside.
Further, it is more often the case than not, that what the Office of Personnel Management states as the requirements of “the law” is simply wrong. OPM is rarely up-to-date on the current case-law as handed down by the Merit Systems Protection Board or the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Compliance with the law is one thing; compliance with the wrong law and an erroneous interpretation of legal requirements is quite another.
To panic is to remain in a morass; to re-review the legal requirements in the administrative process of applying for, and becoming eligible for, Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether under FERS or CSRS, is essential to the road to success.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, discerning important from peripheral issues in the opm denial letter, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and panic reactions from opm's letters, focusing on the substantive issues of the opm denial letter, getting distracted with peripheral issues, identifying what substantive concerns the opm rep had when he or she denied benefits, important and peripheral medical issues in the fers csrs disability application, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement letters and how to deal with them, owcp disability retirement, paying attention to substantive concerns after a denial, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, reacting to a letter from the office of personnel management, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing us government disability employees anywhere, stressing the substantive issues in a federal disability retirement application, the essence of the opm denial letter, the substance of your disability retirement claim, USPS disability retirement, when the opm disability client insists on using peripheral issues |
Leave a Reply