In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often necessary to perform a methodological analysis similar to a “risk-benefits” evaluation before proceeding down the path in attempting to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that one is eligible for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
The risks versus benefits analysis should already have been performed: the necessity of filing because of one’s medical conditions should have answered any such issues arising from such a concern. The “other” analytical approach, however, often revolves around the ever-prevalent and uniquely human ability to endlessly ruminate: the “What if” syndrome. What if I don’t get the disability retirement? What if my agency terminates me before I get approved? What if…
Such questions, while important to consider, should be first preceded by the overarching “what-if” question of all, which generally answers all subsequent similar questions: “What if I don’t file?” Presumably, one comes to a point in deciding to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits because of a medical condition which has progressively or suddenly come to a point where it prevents one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job.
Given that, the options to be clarified are quite simple: If one does not file, then one will either have to continue working in the same or similar capacity; or one can resign and walk away, perhaps with a deferred retirement at age 65. Are any of those options truly viable? Ergo, many — if not all — of the other “what if” questions resolve themselves by first clarifying the penultimate what-if question.
Sequential clarification of one’s options is an important step in the reflective process of decision-making; take the time to consider the options; clarify the options; then, when the decision to prepare, formulate and file for Federal Disability Retirement benefitsbecomes a matter of necessity, move forward with the view that one will be approved precisely because the facts prove the case, without engaging in the self-defeating, very-human endeavor of self-doubt and questioning.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, conditions that prevent performing the essential elements of your fed job, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement with the us government: putting all the employee's options on the table, disabled federal employees and narrowing down their options, evaluating the risks versus benefits of continuing working with a disability, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal owcp and your options for the future, fers disability blog, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement: an option that very often becomes a necessity, lawyer role in federal disability cases, medical disability lawyers opm, medical retirement options for federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, representing federal employees in and outside the country, risk-benefits analysis after a serious injury in the federal workplace, studying the risks and benefits of a federal disability retirement claim, the disabled federal employee and the options on the table, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the problem of overwhelming ourselves with different what-if scenarios, the retirement options that an injured or disabled federal worker has, the risk of a federal employee's inaction after a disability, USPS disability retirement, usps plus disability options, what are my options if I suffer from a serious injury in the postal service, what-if scenarios after submitting my opm disability application, when filing for federal disability retirement is not only an option anymore, when medical retirement is the only option for a federal employee |
Leave a Reply