The Department of Veterans Affairs does it; in obtaining a scheduled award from the Officer of Workers’ Compensation Programs, administered under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA), the amount determined is based upon it; and so it is understandable that confusions may arise as to its relevance, import and various applicable uses.
Disability ratings represent an attempt to quantify the extent of one’s medical condition, injury, or loss of limb or body mobility, flexion, ability to use, etc. Such attempt at quantification, no matter what mathematical calculus or methodology employed, must by necessity involve a level of subjectivity; for any such attempt is pre-determined by the criteria which is applied, and any such criteria which purports to apply universally will be unable to accommodate the uniqueness of an individualized case.
In a FERS or CSRS Disability Retirement case, the benefit provided is a flat rate, and is set by statute. It does not increase or decrease based upon a percentage assignation of a medical disability. Similarly, in Social Security Disability, the amount of the annuity received does not change because of an increase in percentage.
Whether one can or should use the assigned percentage rating from the VA or from OWCP, in proving or attempting to prove eligibility in FERS or CSRS Disability Retirement cases, is a matter of discretion. The amount of the disability rating; whether the gross number is a combination of fairly insignificant fractured percentages; the substantive discussion justifying each number, etc. — all of those factors must be taken into consideration before using it in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Numbers alone rarely mean anything; in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is not the numbers, but the words which support them, which will make the difference.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, discretionary decisions to submit a good opm disability claim, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement annuity does not depend on the severity of the medical condition, federal disability retirement tools, FERS disability retirement, how disabled are you under fers/csrs disability retirement laws?, improving chances of getting federal disability retirement, medical ratings in fers disability retirement, no disability ''ratings'' opm disability law -- they either find you disabled or not, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, percentage of disability myth in federal disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, proving you are eligible to medically retire from the federal government, questions about discretionary decision-making, ratings of disability and its potential use to support a fers disability application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, stating facts versus proving a fers disability retirement case, submitting mandatory forms and discretionary documents to the opm, the severity of a disability concept as quantified by ratings does not apply to opm disability retirement rules, the use disability ratings under fers/csrs, tips for proving your federal disability retirement eligibility, tools a disabled federal employee can use to prove his or her case, using percentage designations in opm disability retirement calculation, USPS disability retirement, you still have to prove the federal disability claim, your opm attorney's discretionary decision making |