The position of the applicant is a uniquely vulnerable one; for, as one who is requesting a benefit from a governmental entity, he or she is essentially powerless to act except in response to the agency’s determination on approving or denying a Federal Disability Retirement application.
There are certain “pressure points” which can be attempted, the efficacy of which is questionable but nevertheless engaged in: repeated calls (although one may suspect that excessive inquiries may ultimately reflect in a detrimental way); attempted influences via backdoor channels; or perhaps a request for a Congressional inquiry through one’s representative; and other similar methods — some more effective than others. But it is ultimately the respective positions of the applicant-versus-agency which defines the underlying sense of powerlessness-versus-power; for, in the end, the agency can make any determination it wants, with a basis of rationality or one which issues a complex and garbled statement of reasonings which may not possess any meaningful import as reflected in the law.
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is a powerful agency which is granted a special position and status — one which is responsible for the administration of retirement issues impacting upon all Federal and Postal employees. Such a position is indeed one of heightened sensitivity and responsibility; and while the respective positions of the “little guy” (the Federal or Postal employee) as opposed to the “big guy” (the U.S. Office of Personnel Management) comes down to nothing more than individual human beings, it is the status granted to the latter which makes all the difference, and those within the agency should take such a position with the utmost of seriousness and gravity.
Ultimately, most case workers at OPM are doing the best they can with the tools and manpower provided; from the viewpoint of the applicant waiting for his or her Federal Disability Retirement application to be determined, however, that sense of vulnerability — where one’s future is “on hold” until an action is initiated by OPM — is what makes the entire process a frustrating one.
In the end, there is nothing which can change the respective positions of the applicant-versus-agency, until an approval from OPM is granted, and the status of “applicant” is then transformed into one of “annuitant” — at which point, a new set of respective positions are imposed.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Applicant | Tagged: a reflection about opm's power and its responsability with the disabled federal employees, applicant's claim for compensation for non occupational disease, applicant’s report on disability retirement fers, applying for federal disability, beware of opm's policies before appealing ssdi denial, civil service disability retirement, federal disability attorney, federal employee disability, federal employment and the difficult plight of living with a disability, filing for OPM disability retirement, keeping emotions under control will help an opm disability applicant, legal representation for injured federal workers, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, medical conditions symptoms and the opm disability applicant, one comparative metaphor to the federal disability applicant versus the opm, opm disability application paperwork flow, opm disability statements made by applicant, opm's power to deny or approve federal disability retirement applications, power and responsibility during the federal disability retirement process, the almost unchecked agency power in the name of efficiency, the difficult plight of a postal employee with a serious medical condition, the federal disability process can be characterized as the battle between David and Goliath, the federal disability retirement fight: david versus goliath, the limited power of the opm after the third fers disability stage, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm's power of the opion in federal disability matters, the plight of the injured and disabled working in some federal positions, the weak bargaining power of the disabled versus the resources of a large government bureaucracy, time/process issues in OPM disability retirement, tips for unrepresented opm disability applicants, unequal arena opponents: the office of personnel management versus the federal disability retirement applicant, with opm's power comes its responsibility and fair treatment to all federal disability applicants |
Leave a Reply