During the course of preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the issue of “accommodations” must be addressed — if only in completing Standard Form 3112D (otherwise designated as “Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts”).
It may well be that the Federal or Postal employee’s employing agency has been performing an informal “cost-benefits” analysis throughout the years, and that certain attempts at accommodating the Postal worker’s or other Federal employee’s medical conditions have been ongoing.
Thus, such attempts may include temporary suspension or unofficial elimination of certain key elements of one’s position description; allowance for teleworking for all or part of a workweek; disallowing necessary travel for onsite inspections, etc. These and other attempts by an agency in order to retain the experience and technical expertise of a Federal or Postal employee, are all honorable and reasonable measures by the agency to keep the employee employed.
When the time comes, however, for the Federal or Postal employee to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits because he or she has reached a “point of no return” in terms of the progressively debilitating nature of the medical condition, where all such informal accommodations are no longer helpful in allowing for continuing functionality in the workplace, the Federal or Postal entity may well have always considered such measures to meet the standard of an “accommodation”. Such a thought process is normally wrong. But agencies, in completing SF 3112D, will often thoughtlessly attempt to characterize such prior attempts as legally-viable accommodations.
It is up to the Federal or Postal Disability Retirement applicant to point out the error — something which OPM is more than willing to pounce upon unless corrected by the applicant or his/her attorney.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty | Tagged: accommodation under OPM disability law, blogs owcp and opm disability issues, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement for postal workers under limited duty, disability retirement opm legal accommodation, excessing light duty from post office, federal disability law blog, federal workmans comp limited duty capacity, FERS disability retirement, how federal managers define adequate accommodation in the workplace, ill postal workers and lack of viable accommodation plans in the usps, incentives to light duty employees to remain productive, injury compensation and light limited duty, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal accommodation for Postal workers, legal accommodation under fers disability rules, light duty and limited duty concepts in the federal workplace, light duty and reasonable accommodation, limited duty and rehab employees in the postal service, minor job adjustments are not accommodations under fers disability law, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp accommodations, postal service disability retirement, real accommodation under federal disability retirement law, reasonable accommodation of federal workers, Standard Form 3112D, the disabled federal worker and accommodation issues at the workplace, the perception of accommodation among federal supervisors, the postal service's influence on disability matters through the sf 3112d, the postal supervisor and the sf 3112b, using the legal definition of accommodation in the 3112a, usps accommodation, USPS disability retirement, usps light duty is usually not real accommodation under opm disability rules, usps management reasonable accommodation, what's really legal accommodation under the fers and csrs statues |
Leave a Reply