Private, subjective mental states are unique by self-definition; they become public knowledge only when shared with deliberate intent, revealing the inner thoughts, private conceptual pondering, and narrative voices of the subjective “I”. Pain is similar in form, in that one can mask and keep private the experiential factor of pain, just as one can remain hidden in the private thoughts one engages.
Qualia, in philosophy, has to do with the subjective experience of one’s encounter with the greater world; and the first person attribution of a mental state encompasses the “I” in the midst of that universe of contained subjectivity. The problem always is how one can and should relate the private experience when a public narrative of that subjectivity is required.
For Federal and Postal employees who must file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the problem of conveying in persuasive form and argumentation, of transversing the chasm between the “qualia” of one’s subjective mental state into the foray of medicine, diagnostic testing, clinical encounters with medical professionals, and the entire compendium of what constitutes the “objective” world, is a necessary prerequisite where the incommensurable wall must be overcome.
An effective OPM Disability Retirement application under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, is like watching a gymnast on a balance beam; overstating the subjective may result in loss of that balance. Federal employees and Postal workers who suffer from those specific medical conditions which are considered “unverifiable” through normal channels of diagnostic methodologies — Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, chronic and intractable pain, etc. — must find ways where the public description goes beyond the qualia of private mental attributes.
In many ways, we have progressed culturally; and such progressivism is found in the diminishment and near-extinguishment of that dualism between the cognitive and the physical, and this is established by the general acceptance of psychiatric conditions as being just as “valid” as physical maladies. But old haunts and biased perspectives still abound, and during such times of transition, one must still take care in how one approaches subjectivity in the wake of the yearning for objectively verifiable evidentiary components.
Like the public who watches the graceful movements of a gymnast on a balance beam, it is the roar of the crowd in appreciation one seeks, and not the gasp of disappointment when lack of balance results in a sudden and unexpected fall.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a history of mistreatment and wrong expectation for federal workers with cognitive disabilities, attorney help in cases of muscles pain, back pain fers disability, barriers of credibility and legal subjectivity in your path towards fers medical retirement, chronic back pain among postal workers, chronic pain cases in opm disability retirement, cognitive dysfunctions impacting federal workers, csrs disability retirement for federal employees, debilitating back pain in federal employees, describing the true picture of your pain to an opm disability retirement case worker, diffuse pain syndrome among federal workers, fers disability retirement is possible for chronic pain problems but in some cases is more difficult to prove, filing for federal disability retirement benefits, government discrimination cognitive incapacity claims, if chronic pain is such a subjective matter how a federal employee's debilitating pain can be proved?, if the federal employee can not longer withstand daily chronic pain, lack of objective medical evidence used to deny postal disability, looking at ''objective truth" through the eyes of the opm during the fers disability process, lower back pain is a condition that can qualify you for opm disability even if you don't have objective evidence such as an mri or blood tests, maintaining an objective perspective on your fers disability application even in cases of ''subjective'' disabilities, mental or physical impairments and light duty postal workers, objective and subjective factors in your federal disability claim, objective medical evidence for federal disability cases, OPM subjective methodology, owcp disability retirement, owcp pain and subjective matters, pain owcp.gov or opm?, postal service disability retirement, postal workers with sciatica nerve pain, presenting a personal disability matter objectively, recognizing when change is necessary, restoration following injury and pain for federal employment, severe and radiating pain, the mental state of a government employee is aggravated when he or she cannot longer work, thoracic discogenic pain syndrome and the federal worker, trying to be objective in a matter considered to be mostly subjective by the office of personnel management, USPS disability retirement, when "objective medical evidence" is not necessary, when the federal employee chooses to continue with pain and a the progressive deterioration of health, when the opm refuses to consider ''subjective'' evidence, when the postal employee can't take the pain anymore, working with pain in the federal workplace |
Leave a Reply