Do outside influences other than “the law” impact upon benefits applied for? Depending upon what particular perspective one has, the human animal can be characterized as either extremely simple, or supremely complex. In comparison to other animals, one needs to only look at the vast civilization of architectural magnificence, artistic beauty, and acts of compassion and empathy, to arrive at the latter conclusion. But human nature often overrules the complex beauty of such accomplishments, leaving one with the unmistakeable conclusion of the former.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, one must proceed and assume such an application based upon the legal criteria as applied, and expect a fair and impartial review based upon the statutory implementation of such rules and regulations.
But in these economic times… Does the Federal Government want to limit the number of applicants approved (the unspoken “quota” argument)? Is there an underlying motive other than medical reasons, as to why the Federal or Postal employee is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits (OPM’s suspicions)? Do “unofficial policies from on high” ever apply?
Such questions and concerns are often asked, but ultimately they are irrelevancies. For, in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM, one must move forward regardless, and put together the best case possible, based upon the evidence one has.
Any other approach, or becoming unduly concerned with collateral issues, will only detract and distract from the essence of a Federal Disability Retirement case.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
OPM Disability Retirement, Et Cetera… 