Do outside influences other than “the law” impact upon benefits applied for? Depending upon what particular perspective one has, the human animal can be characterized as either extremely simple, or supremely complex. In comparison to other animals, one needs to only look at the vast civilization of architectural magnificence, artistic beauty, and acts of compassion and empathy, to arrive at the latter conclusion. But human nature often overrules the complex beauty of such accomplishments, leaving one with the unmistakeable conclusion of the former.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, one must proceed and assume such an application based upon the legal criteria as applied, and expect a fair and impartial review based upon the statutory implementation of such rules and regulations.
But in these economic times… Does the Federal Government want to limit the number of applicants approved (the unspoken “quota” argument)? Is there an underlying motive other than medical reasons, as to why the Federal or Postal employee is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits (OPM’s suspicions)? Do “unofficial policies from on high” ever apply?
Such questions and concerns are often asked, but ultimately they are irrelevancies. For, in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM, one must move forward regardless, and put together the best case possible, based upon the evidence one has.
Any other approach, or becoming unduly concerned with collateral issues, will only detract and distract from the essence of a Federal Disability Retirement case.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: an assumption that one should still hold in an inherently imperfect process: prepare your best possible federal disability retirement case, attorney for federal disability retirement, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, concerns an injured federal employee may not or should not have during the fers disability retirement process, concerns an injured federal employee should not have during the fers disability retirement process, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, distractions that will weaken your federal disability retirement application, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement and this tough economy, FERS disability retirement, filing for disability retirement in the midst of a tough economy, focusing on the substance of your fers disability claim, getting distracted with peripheral issues, if the opm wants to limit the number of federal disability retirement cases that are approved each year, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, maintaining the focus in the most important opm disability issues, moving forward by putting together an excellent fers disability retirement case, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability in a tough economy, OPM disability retirement, paying attention to the essence of a disability retirement case, Postal disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, the central focus of the federal disability retirement applicant, the federal disability retirement quota argument, the primary focus a federal disability retirement applicant should have, theme, USPS disability retirement, what an injured or disabled postal worker should not worry about, what your main job should be: focusing on how your disability affects your federal job performance | Leave a comment »