Unequivocal statements can go either way: They can either show the force of authority, or unravel a lack of knowledge. In a Federal Disability Retirement case, where a Federal or Postal Worker is attempting to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, such statements of “unequivocal” authority can be seen at any stage of the process. An unequivocal statement of disability can be made by a treating doctor. An unequivocal statement of denial of a Federal Disability Retirement application can be made by an OPM Representative.
What is the distinction and difference between the two? For the former, the medical doctor who makes an unequivocal statement of disability is based upon the history, clinical examinations, experience, possible diagnostic testing, and other criteria applied in coming to a medical conclusion. There accompanies it the force of the doctor’s credentials. The latter is an opinion based upon (hopefully) a comparison of the documentation submitted by the Federal or Postal worker, and the “letter of the law”. But that assumes that the OPM Representative understands and correctly applies the law. Such an assumption is often erroneous, inasmuch as the OPM Representative is not a lawyer — and that is just the first of many reasons.
Don’t be fooled by unequivocal statements; authority of such statements must have a force of rational basis and credentials, and not just because a person “says so”.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors, Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, attorney representation before the office of personnel management (opm), attorneys representing postal workers in disability cases, civil service disability, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, FERS medical retirement, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal authority on opm disability retirement law, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability lawyer, opm disability reps don't have the final say on who will get opm disability, opm representative's understanding of opm disability law, opm's authority over the federal disability retirement process, owcp disability retirement, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", representing federal employees in and outside the country, statements of disability during the opm disability process, the authority and credentials of a federal disability lawyer, the credibility of an unequivocal statement in a federal disability application, the limited power of an opm disability retirement specialist, the medical authoritative of a treating physician in a federal disability claim, the medical authority of an experienced family doctor in opm disability claims, the opm rep doesn't have the last word in your federal disability claim, the power of an opm disability rep's statements: theory and practice, unequivocal statements in a fers disability case, USPS disability retirement benefits, when opm disability retirement specialists expose their knowledge of opm disability law, when the opm representative reviews your disability application |
Leave a Reply